|
Post by swarm on Jan 12, 2007 13:15:07 GMT -5
Three words...
Eight Sided Ring.
who else has ideas?
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 12, 2007 13:18:03 GMT -5
broadcasters who dont put you asleep and are smart.
|
|
|
Post by gamtime247 on Jan 12, 2007 13:20:55 GMT -5
Make the main focus of the show guys like Bobby Roode and LAX, and not on a guy who I watched in Starrcade '89 and a 6'9 Kane rip off.
|
|
|
Post by Hegemony on Jan 12, 2007 13:21:57 GMT -5
They need to SLOW DOWN and stop cramming numerous angles into a few minute segment. That way each angle has a chance to actually get over and make an "Impact".
They also need a booker that is not stuck in 1997, realizing that what sells PPVs today is not the same as it was a decade earlier.
|
|
|
Post by JED-SE on Jan 12, 2007 13:33:04 GMT -5
Better booking is what they really need. Whether Jarrett, Abyss, Joe Angle, or Christian is the highlight of the show, it matters very little when you have guys like Vince Russo in charge of booking. Now if only Vince didn't have Heyman under contract...
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jan 12, 2007 14:12:01 GMT -5
broadcasters who dont put you asleep and are smart. How can you sleep with Don West yelling at you for one hour stright?
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jan 12, 2007 14:13:04 GMT -5
Make the main focus of the show guys like Bobby Roode and LAX, and not on a guy who I watched in Starrcade '89 and a 6'9 Kane rip off. He's not a 6'9" Kane ripoff. He's a 6'5" Mankind ripoff.
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 12, 2007 14:13:55 GMT -5
very well of course d.d.
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Jan 12, 2007 14:27:43 GMT -5
Make the main focus of the show guys like Bobby Roode and LAX, and not on a guy who I watched in Starrcade '89 and a 6'9 Kane rip off. He's not a 6'9" Kane ripoff. He's a 6'5" Mankind ripoff. How about a 6'9" Kanekind ripoff?
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 12, 2007 14:40:01 GMT -5
Is Abyss really 6'5? He looks more like 6'2 to me. He is also a blatant rip off of both Mankind and Kane.
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jan 12, 2007 15:13:05 GMT -5
I was actually being generous. The original post said 6'9" so I shortened it. I actually had 6'3" until I added a couple of inches.
|
|
|
Post by gamtime247 on Jan 12, 2007 16:50:57 GMT -5
I was actually being generous. The original post said 6'9" so I shortened it. I actually had 6'3" until I added a couple of inches. Its hilarious how small he'd be in a WWE ring yet he's the tallest guy in TNA by about a foot.
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 12, 2007 17:20:11 GMT -5
abyss stands at 6'10 guys.check at obsessed with wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 12, 2007 17:33:10 GMT -5
If Abyss stands at 6'10 then AJ Styles is 3 feet tall.
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 12, 2007 17:35:00 GMT -5
it's true go to obsessed with wrestling if you dont believe me then.
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jan 12, 2007 17:39:30 GMT -5
it's true go to obsessed with wrestling if you dont believe me then. Obsessed with wrestling makes it true?
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 12, 2007 17:39:50 GMT -5
and a.j styles is 5'10 btw. .yes unless you know of someplace else that gives those stats. sheep
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jan 12, 2007 17:43:57 GMT -5
and a.j styles is 5'10 btw. Neilybob, quit neilybobbing to pad your count to 1000. 6'10" is also what TNA lists him as. They list Lance Hoyt as 6'9". He is actually a tall guy and when in the ring it shows. If Hoyt is a legit 6'9", which he isn't, than Abyss is at best 6'5".
|
|
|
Post by Vidtek on Jan 12, 2007 19:29:21 GMT -5
They list Lance Hoyt as 6'9". He is actually a tall guy and when in the ring it shows. If Hoyt is a legit 6'9", which he isn't, than Abyss is at best 6'5". Well I can answer this one...Lance Hoyt really isn't 6'9". I know. I know him. I'm taller than he is by little more than an inch (give or take depending on veriables). I am a grateful and honest 6'6". Although some conveniance stores can list me as 7'+, haha. Anyway, Hoyt is a big guy, no doubt. And a cool one too. But he did look taller than the 6'9" monster in that wierd reverse battle royal/regular battle royal/one on one match thing they did. Not that I care cause ABYSS is the bomb. Oh and the thing TNA need to improve is a second hour so we're not crash courseing threw angles, and better booking. Big Time
|
|
|
Post by Hegemony on Jan 12, 2007 19:34:30 GMT -5
Their two hour special a few weeks ago felt just as rushed and packed as the hour shows do. Until they change the booking in the promotion I don't think twelve hours of programming would be enough to allow their angles to develop at a steady, productive pace. SLOW DOWN!!
|
|