|
|
Post by traviz on Jan 4, 2007 21:42:58 GMT -5
Ok, I didn't finish TNA tonight but I did watch the first half and I have to know....Who did the musical chairs segment put over? What was it supposed to accomplish? Anyone? What did that five minutes of TNA television do?
The stupid VKM segment at least attempted to make it look as though TNA was on the same level as the WWE, but the chairs?...It boogles my muthaf*ckin' mind!
|
|
|
|
Post by steelthunder814 on Jan 4, 2007 21:49:15 GMT -5
ok thats it im banning my wife from tna if tonights show involves musical chairs... i mean Eugene will be ticked off about that
|
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 4, 2007 22:21:02 GMT -5
you think so steelman.
|
|
|
|
Post by steelthunder814 on Jan 4, 2007 22:38:33 GMT -5
Well he is special.just ask ol' Hacksaw
|
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 4, 2007 22:39:12 GMT -5
ok hoooo.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 4, 2007 22:45:50 GMT -5
neilybob will answer to any post no matter what it is just to get his post count up. 24/7 with this guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 4, 2007 22:46:38 GMT -5
you got that right bubba.only 252 until i hit 1000
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 4, 2007 22:51:40 GMT -5
neilybob you would have like 14,000 posts if you hadn't deleted your account 3 times already...
|
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 4, 2007 22:53:12 GMT -5
you're right swarm i will agree to that one.but this time i wont delete my account.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chewey on Jan 4, 2007 23:23:34 GMT -5
Ninja Bob: There is no question that he has not the answer to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chewey on Jan 4, 2007 23:25:41 GMT -5
As for TNA, yeah I watched it tonight too, although I had a little more faith than Savage T did. The opening bout was good, the Spike Dudley-Homicide match was awesome, and that's about it.
Musical chairs? VKM screaming "Michael Hickenbottom" and "Paul Levesque" while wearing ponchos? Samoa Joe ambushing Angle and brawling with him for about fifteen minutes straight before Angle's main event match?
Lame.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Jan 5, 2007 9:14:57 GMT -5
I swung by Spike last night while looking for something to have on as background noise and wandered into the middle of Sinister Minister talking to a very Mankind-looking (and acting) Abyss.
After a couple minutes, I remembered that I had an Amazing Jonathan comedy special on my DVR that I hadn't watched yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 5, 2007 9:33:09 GMT -5
Yeah, Abyss is freaking lame. How anyone likes him is beyond me.
He's a jobber doing a bad impression of a great WWE gimmick.
Loser.
|
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 5, 2007 9:34:19 GMT -5
if you dont like it .then dont watch it it.i dont its that simple.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 5, 2007 10:16:08 GMT -5
It's not that simple neilybob. but thanks for the advice.  |
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Jan 5, 2007 10:27:46 GMT -5
right back at you swarmy. and your little doggy too. |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 5, 2007 10:37:25 GMT -5
all I'm saying is that when I watch TNA, I hope I'm going to see something I like. But it never happens. Just not watching it isn't always the solution.
|
|
|
|
Post by offspring515 on Jan 5, 2007 11:09:09 GMT -5
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.
If you've watched this long, and still hate it (and the continual "TNA SUCKS BECAUSE...." threads would seem to point to you hating it more than ever) maybe it's time to stop watching.
I think giving something a chance to improve is important, but come on...you loathe TNA and pretty much every wrestler involved in it. You're not going to like it this week, or next, or next year, or ever.
It's your tv, and your eyes, so I'm sure you'll proceed as you see best, but giving up the viewing of something you don't enjoy is strong.
10 out of 10 Former World Champions agree.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Jan 5, 2007 11:21:30 GMT -5
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. That statement is only true for an action containing no variables. Watching a specific TV show is not such an action... especially a show such as a wrestling broadcast. The viewer may not be changing his actions, but the content changes -- or has the potential to -- every time. What Swarm does regarding TNA is better classified as "baseless optimism" -- he wants to see something he will enjoy, despite not receiving many indications that he will find it. But the potential is there. |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jan 5, 2007 11:26:58 GMT -5
Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. If you've watched this long, and still hate it (and the continual "TNA SUCKS BECAUSE...." threads would seem to point to you hating it more than ever) maybe it's time to stop watching. I think giving something a chance to improve is important, but come on...you loathe TNA and pretty much every wrestler involved in it. You're not going to like it this week, or next, or next year, or ever. It's your tv, and your eyes, so I'm sure you'll proceed as you see best, but giving up the viewing of something you don't enjoy is strong. 10 out of 10 Former World Champions agree. Are you mad at me because TNA sucks. Not my fault bro. |
|
