|
|
Post by blueraider1 on Aug 26, 2006 16:09:14 GMT -5
Yeah you might want to do the same.  My 8 year old sister called. She wants her burn back. say what? |
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Aug 26, 2006 16:11:10 GMT -5
It's because you feel the need to grossly over-analyze EVERYTHING that you are not getting what I'm saying. I can't help you with that... We're talking about HHH, Cena, and HBK. Not a 60 yr.old out of shape announcer with (God Bless him) Bells Palsy... Let's keep things in perspective ok? Jim Ross beat Triple H...Jim Ross = Umaga... Perspective... Jim Ross beat Triple H...Jim Ross = Umaga... Perspective... And "Overanalyzing" your point is a fair trade off to ignoring certain things I've said and focusing on one little sentence as you've occasionally had a "need" to do...See, we all have our quirks...I just tend not to bring them up...  Out of respect for your headache I have nothing more to say... |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Aug 26, 2006 16:20:01 GMT -5
It's because you feel the need to grossly over-analyze EVERYTHING that you are not getting what I'm saying. I can't help you with that... We're talking about HHH, Cena, and HBK. Not a 60 yr.old out of shape announcer with (God Bless him) Bells Palsy... Let's keep things in perspective ok? Jim Ross beat Triple H...Jim Ross = Umaga... Perspective... But you said Jim Ross could beat Umaga. So if Jim Ross = Umaga, then what you're really saying is that you're totally stoned out of your mind. Seriously dude, don't debate just to debate. You have to know what the F you are trying to say and remember it (key). |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Aug 26, 2006 16:24:51 GMT -5
It's because you feel the need to grossly over-analyze EVERYTHING that you are not getting what I'm saying. I can't help you with that... We're talking about HHH, Cena, and HBK. Not a 60 yr.old out of shape announcer with (God Bless him) Bells Palsy... Let's keep things in perspective ok? Jim Ross beat Triple H...Jim Ross = Umaga... Perspective... Jim Ross beat Triple H...Jim Ross = Umaga... Perspective... And "Overanalyzing" your point is a fair trade off to ignoring certain things I've said and focusing on one little sentence as you've occasionally had a "need" to do...See, we all have our quirks...I just tend not to bring them up... Out of respect for your headache I have nothing more to say... out of respect for your headache I have nothing more to say...  |
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Aug 26, 2006 16:42:35 GMT -5
Jim Ross beat Triple H...Jim Ross = Umaga... Perspective... But you said Jim Ross could beat Umaga. So if Jim Ross = Umaga, then what you're really saying is that you're totally stoned out of your mind. Seriously dude, don't debate just to debate. You have to know what the F you are trying to say and remember it (key). Hehe....NOW who's overanalyzing...? And speaking of debating just to debate...is that the same thing as attempting to restart a 14 page thread 4 times..? Now, you said Umaga won over HBK Triple H and Cena...The fact that he was heavily assisted isn't worth mentioning because it doesn't matter to you...Well, Jim Ross also holds a pinfall victory over Triple H... My point is, Jim Ross could beat Umaga no problem...I mean, he beat Triple H right..? This is where interference is worth noting...It also makes for a stronger run for a heel if they win WITHOUT lots of interference...Re: all the guys I mentioned before... Let's put it like this: Which sounds more impressive? Umaga beat Triple H with the help of Estrada, Shane McMahon and Vince McMahon...Or Great Khali cleanly squashed the Undertaker..? Both heels, both victorious, one sounds a lot more impressive than the other...I never said Umaga DIDN'T beat Triple H, I said the fact that he had help took away from his win...I don't see how my saying that is a big deal... |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Aug 26, 2006 17:00:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Aug 26, 2006 17:02:44 GMT -5
Hmm...Well I guess I've been told... ;D
Congrats Swarm, I really have no way to respond... ;D
|
|
