|
|
Post by markoda on Aug 19, 2007 16:54:37 GMT -5
Not sure if this has been posted anywhere else on the board yet, but I noticed this earlier and figured I would share.
|
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Aug 19, 2007 17:56:30 GMT -5
Ha ha, not bad.
If TNA wasn't so damn awful this would go a lot further.
|
|
|
|
Post by Highway61Revisited on Aug 19, 2007 18:45:57 GMT -5
Did anyone else feel like the guys in CT were right?
TNA should worry about, oh I don't know, putting on a watchable product before they send Kurt Angle out bashing the WWE. People aren't going to watch because of a bad cheap shots alone.
Then again I don't think anyone really wants to watch the self-destruction of Kurt Angle which is just getting painful at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by gatekeeper on Aug 19, 2007 21:33:29 GMT -5
2 words: sour grapes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Highway61Revisited on Aug 19, 2007 22:22:22 GMT -5
You'd think he would have the foresight to not burn that bridge *completely*. I'd want options after TNA is an after-thought. |
|
|
|
Post by josharpie99 on Aug 19, 2007 22:33:41 GMT -5
This could have been much better than what it was. The funniest thing said was "don't you guys have a bunch of crappy movies to make." LOL. I think Kurt was supposed to be in one of those "crappy" movies himself but WWE let him go.
|
|
|
|
Post by JamieOD on Aug 20, 2007 2:38:26 GMT -5
Did anyone else feel like the guys in CT were right? TNA should worry about, oh I don't know, putting on a watchable product before they send Kurt Angle out bashing the WWE. People aren't going to watch because of a bad cheap shots alone. This is why there are people saying TNA is turning into the last years of WCW. Because it is taking too many pointless shots at the WWE. |
|
|
|
Post by JED-SE on Aug 20, 2007 7:58:26 GMT -5
WCW took shots at WWE even before they were going down. (ie - the introduction of Vincient of the NWO, this happened when WCW was beating WWE in the ratings) The difference between the scenarios is that when Russo was behind the scenes while shots were being taken at WWE, they weren't as funny.
While this bit was ammusing, TNA DOES need to take the time to put together better storylines within TNA and take less time, effort, and money towards ripping on WWE. TNA has to realize that while they are competing against WWE (or trying to atleast) they aren't really in a position to be laughing at WWE. Work on your show and get your ratings in atleast in a competitive match against WWE before you worry about making fun of them. Right now, WWE isn't that worried about TNA, and for good reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by deadlikeme on Aug 20, 2007 13:25:50 GMT -5
Yeah this is a rather stupid thing to pull right now. TNA has been terrible in storylines, and most of the wrestlers seem to have abandoned their ability to have a good match, or are being pushed aside by the "older" talent TNA is bringing in. Let the wrestlers wrestle, and give Russo the boot!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Shon Maxx on Sept 20, 2007 7:49:42 GMT -5
Yeah this is a rather stupid thing to pull right now. TNA has been terrible in storylines, and most of the wrestlers seem to have abandoned their ability to have a good match, or are being pushed aside by the "older" talent TNA is bringing in. Let the wrestlers wrestle, and give Russo the boot!! Wrestlers wrestling in a wrestling organization? Not on Russo's watch! Take care, Jay |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Sept 20, 2007 10:42:51 GMT -5
TNA is the jealous middle child of wrestling.  |
|
|
|
Post by vansabu on Sept 20, 2007 12:29:00 GMT -5
TNA = EVE PLUMB
|
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Sept 20, 2007 12:40:48 GMT -5
why is jan brady equal to tna ? just don't get it harmon.  |
|
|
|
Post by JED-SE on Sept 20, 2007 13:47:35 GMT -5
Jan Brady was the middle child (from Swarm's post), and she complained a lot on the TV show.
|
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Sept 20, 2007 14:20:29 GMT -5
Jan Brady was the middle child (from Swarm's post), and she complained a lot on the TV show. thanks for clearing that up.  |
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncross on Sept 20, 2007 18:19:29 GMT -5
I have to agree that TNA needs to worry about their product and not attack the WWE, which I thought they were done doing... but I guess not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe on Sept 20, 2007 21:36:24 GMT -5
When I was watching this, the only thing that came to mind is that WWE is making major theatrical releases while TNA is making 4-minute shorts with actors that couldn't get work in silent commercials dedicated to WWE.
That pretty much says it all about the two companies.
|
|
|
|
Post by mwjergs on Sept 24, 2007 13:43:36 GMT -5
Glad to see that wrestling is still the name on the marquee and the focus of the company's efforts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Sept 24, 2007 19:28:49 GMT -5
When I was watching this, the only thing that came to mind is that WWE is making major theatrical releases while TNA is making 4-minute shorts with actors that couldn't get work in silent commercials dedicated to WWE. That pretty much says it all about the two companies.  We suck big time. |
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Sept 24, 2007 20:04:25 GMT -5
is it me or is angle being a bigger (censored) then usual ?
|
|
