|
|
Post by JamieOD on Feb 11, 2007 4:30:34 GMT -5
Yeah, I know that Kenny was the main guy from the Spirit Squad but I would have thought at least 2 others would stay to form a new team with a new look or gimmick. As for Angle, I've noticed he spends more time blasting other people instead of promoting TNA during his interviews.
|
|
|
|
Post by azfan on Mar 24, 2007 18:17:48 GMT -5
I lost respect for the guy,and was never a fan anyway. I saw him a while back saying he was the best of all time, which i think is crazy. As for ripping HHH, i don't think he'd be bigger than Trips. And HBK, didn't Shawn lay down for him at a Wretlemania? Huge sour grapes from this guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Mar 26, 2007 13:54:22 GMT -5
Angle has definitely lost it. Too bad for a period of time he was my favorite guy out there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Mar 26, 2007 14:22:49 GMT -5
While certainly a subjective matter, it is still quite bone headed and "smarky" to claim that a stiff, out of shape, mid card indy wrestler is anywhere in the same league as a WWE Main Eventer. Umaga - WWE main eventer Eddie Fatu - stiff out of shape WWE tag wrestler... Splattercat - not smarky enough to care either way, but is insightful enough to see both sides of the comparison... Ultimately, they are both products of their environments...Joe should be a huge star, but I imagine agendas/schedules/politics/ whatever have staunched that...Eddie Fatu worked an 80's Wild Samoan gimmick to success...He didn't have to contribute anything, he didn't have to cut promos, he didn't have to say a single (English) word...All he had to do was what he was told, and perform in the ring, and he made it work...Good for him... Thinking about it, I imagine there are dozens of guys out there who would kill to have that opportunity; To do nothing but wrestle...Not to offer advice, or fight for creative control, but just be handpicked for a role you happen to like and be very good at, and wrestle... Like I said, Good for him...Advantage Eddie Fatu... |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 26, 2007 14:28:54 GMT -5
While certainly a subjective matter, it is still quite bone headed and "smarky" to claim that a stiff, out of shape, mid card indy wrestler is anywhere in the same league as a WWE Main Eventer. Umaga - WWE main eventer Eddie Fatu - stiff out of shape WWE tag wrestler... Splattercat - not smarky enough to care either way, but is insightful enough to see both sides of the comparison... This makes no sense. |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 26, 2007 14:30:46 GMT -5
Umaga - WWE main eventer Eddie Fatu - stiff out of shape WWE tag wrestler... Splattercat - not smarky enough to care either way, but is insightful enough to see both sides of the comparison... This makes no sense. Actaully I take that back. That whole post made no sense, not just that part. In the words of Geico Caveman... "Yeah...uhh...Whaaaat?" |
|
|
|
Post by Eliath on Mar 26, 2007 16:21:16 GMT -5
Umaga - WWE main eventer Eddie Fatu - stiff out of shape WWE tag wrestler... Splattercat - not smarky enough to care either way, but is insightful enough to see both sides of the comparison... This makes no sense. Umaga's real name is Eddie Fatu |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 26, 2007 16:22:54 GMT -5
Umaga's real name is Eddie Fatu Thank you Eliath I got that part. |
|
|
|
Post by Eliath on Mar 26, 2007 16:24:20 GMT -5
No problem, just trying to clear things up for you.  |
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Mar 26, 2007 20:45:11 GMT -5
"Advantage: Eddie Fatu" makes no sense..? That's just shameful...
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 26, 2007 22:50:42 GMT -5
"Advantage: Eddie Fatu" makes no sense..? That's just shameful... That you wrote it? I know. Weird. |
|
