|
Post by Chewey on Nov 27, 2007 2:06:33 GMT -5
So on Trent Lawless's latest show, he answered some questions regarding how Shylock was able to trust that Splatter would not commit a triple-cross on him at the Countdown to Destruction card. I still do not buy it.
How do we know that Saboteur intended for the payoff of his scheme to occur at COD? How do we know that Saboteur and Splatter aren't still stringing Shylock along?
I totally see Splatter turning on Shylock down the line. As of right now, I have no idea who is on whose side.
|
|
|
Post by Chewey on Nov 27, 2007 2:07:36 GMT -5
Also, forgot to add that somehow, in my own alternate ending of POW Revival 2122, it is actually Shylock who ends up double-crossing Splatter...
Any takers as to why? ;D
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Nov 27, 2007 7:01:36 GMT -5
maybe because the two are going to team up against splatter ?
|
|
|
Post by Chewey on Nov 28, 2007 9:27:06 GMT -5
nope. try again, neily
|
|
|
Post by Aquinas on Jan 23, 2008 11:40:19 GMT -5
Maybe I'm a sucker, but I guess I buy the Splatter-Shylock alliance as being pretty tight. Splatter's got that older mentor thing down well, and the way it's been written, especially after his double-cross of Saboteur -- it just seems rock-solid to me. But Saboteur is so diabolical, maybe you're right and he's still got the upper hand
|
|
|
Post by Chewey on Jan 23, 2008 13:48:38 GMT -5
I've got an alternate storyline to the last set which I may post one of these days after I tell Mark about it (which he will probably frown upon, but I still think it's pretty good for an "alternate" ending )
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Jan 23, 2008 22:07:10 GMT -5
Whatever anybody else does in their own feds, I'd never frown upon. Just don't pretend it's better than my idea.
|
|