|
Post by Big Bri on Mar 29, 2009 17:55:00 GMT -5
I know that these debates spark up every year around this time, but why the heck didn't Ted DiBiase get inducted into the WWE Hall Of Fame this year?
With the event taking place in Houston I thought it'd be a perfect time to induct DiBiase because of his time in Mid-South (kinda like Bill Watts).
I hate to get on this point that has already been stated all over the place, but KOKO B. WARE OVER DiBIASE!?!?!?!?!?!? I think the Brooklyn Brawler has more HOF merit than Koko!
I'm thinking the only reason why DiBiase hasn't been inducted yet is money (no pun intended). He's already written a book produced by WWE. Now, there could still be money made off a DVD, but then again, I doubt they'll get a book or DVD about Koko that many people would want to buy.
One of the greatest workers and greatest heels of all time is getting the short end of the stick, year after year.
Anybody agree or disagree?
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Mar 30, 2009 9:18:41 GMT -5
Really, after Koko's induction the only argument that can be made is that they're saving him for a reason.
|
|
|
Post by Scott Fire on Apr 2, 2009 20:22:33 GMT -5
I think this year's class was loaded enough, - Koko, and that is why he didn't get inducted.
|
|