|
|
Post by LWPD on Jul 12, 2007 20:09:50 GMT -5
Help set the qualifications that should be used in the vetting process for determining candidacies for the Tag Team Wing of the CotG Online HOF. Decide whether or not the number of official years together should be uninterrupted or not.
If voting 'something else' please define what that something else would be.
Poll will remain open one month.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Beck on Jul 13, 2007 17:59:42 GMT -5
In the early days Tom would put teams together for a year and then have them split...The AniMen did this religiously with Animal Pack and The Beasts of Burden...one year one team was in and the next another...and then back and then back again...Both Would get my vote as they were AWESOME for me, Badger was a great Tag Partner and Battering Ram and Iron Mane both brought styles with them that made the teams unique but, if you ask me, HOF worthy...
I say 1 year together is long enough...there will be very few teams that were 1-year-wonders that deserve indication, but the voters will decide if that team had the impact in their fed to get them in.
Just ask Mark about Massif and Mesmer...
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jul 13, 2007 19:15:23 GMT -5
I voted for 5 years, but I also think that a team's legacy will take care of this itself... I can't think of any teams that were very short term that are Hall of Fame worthy, really.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wad on Jul 13, 2007 20:29:06 GMT -5
I would say at least two consecutive years as a team.
Call it the "Titan rule," or the Ani-Man rule, for what it's worth.
Also, I'd assume the GWF Files is the arbiter of official team credits.
|
|
|
|
Post by gatekeeper on Jul 13, 2007 21:10:10 GMT -5
I like 2 years.
That's should be the minimum.
|
|
|
|
Post by MikeMcKinney on Jul 13, 2007 21:14:54 GMT -5
I like 2 years. That's should be the minimum. What he said. |
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Breath on Jul 13, 2007 21:20:15 GMT -5
I voted for three.
I don't think that they need to be consectutive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jul 13, 2007 21:46:35 GMT -5
2 years works for me too.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Jul 14, 2007 0:14:54 GMT -5
I also went with 2 years. For example, Dorado Sundown was in the GWF from 2074-2076 and (although I'm not sure they would get inducted into the COTG Online Hall of Fame) I believe they at least deserve to be on the ballot.
|
|
|
|
Post by LWPD on Jul 15, 2007 7:29:05 GMT -5
Just a reminder...those voting for 'something else' need to openly state what that something else vote stands for...as Pete Beck, Wad, Payback, MikeMcKinney, Matt & Mr. Vegas have all done. We already have both one year and two year suggestions that fall under that category. In order for a vote to be calculated it needs to be clearly defined.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jul 15, 2007 7:49:03 GMT -5
I went with 5 years, but I don't think that needs to be consecutive.
|
|
|
|
Post by steefposton on Jul 16, 2007 21:04:41 GMT -5
I don't think consecutive needs to be there either, but I like 3 years (the likelihood of someone getting in with only 2 years together is slim, but maybe someone will be an exception) Generally it will be the long lasting teams (gladiators, cosmic forces, etc) that will be there.
|
|
|
|
Post by bauermann on Jul 16, 2007 23:46:16 GMT -5
I like 2 years. That's should be the minimum. What he said. What they said. |
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Jul 17, 2007 6:15:20 GMT -5
I feel 5 is enough ?
|
|
|
|
Post by tystates on Jul 17, 2007 10:43:08 GMT -5
One year as a team. What are the chances a team that is only together one year is going to be considered for the Hall of Fame? Not much.
|
|
|
|
Post by toasterboy on Jul 17, 2007 10:51:04 GMT -5
2 years
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Bri on Jul 30, 2007 0:04:08 GMT -5
One year as a team. What are the chances a team that is only together one year is going to be considered for the Hall of Fame? Not much. What HE said. |
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Jul 30, 2007 22:44:57 GMT -5
One year as a team. What are the chances a team that is only together one year is going to be considered for the Hall of Fame? Not much. What HE said. I agree with Bri. It'll be almost impossible for a one year team to make it; but every team should stand on it's own with out a time constraint. |
|
|
|
Post by LWPD on Aug 14, 2007 19:44:46 GMT -5
Majority vote has determined that the tenure criteria for a tag team to qualify for the Tag Team Wing of the ballot will be two years. Pending the success of the vetting process...the tentative date for the first CotG HOF Tag Team Ballot will be in November.
Thank you to everyone who took the time to particpate.
|
|
