|
Post by LWPD on Jul 9, 2007 19:25:16 GMT -5
How Often Should CotG HOF Cycles Run?
Once per year would coincide with new candidates entering into each cycle (meeting the five year retirement rule).
Twice a year would be the most frequent pace I'd personally support...perhaps spaced out six months from the start of each cycle just to keep the institution somewhat active. It may also be helpful as a device to deal with the 'separate wings' issue that still needs to be fleshed out.
Any ideas regarding an alternative form of pacing would also be interesting to hear.
Pro or con feel free to make your case. The poll will be left open for a one month period...and majority vote decides the format going forward.
|
|
|
Post by tystates on Jul 9, 2007 20:41:42 GMT -5
Once a year seems fine to me. Sets are only coming out once a year at the moment too. The voting is a lot of work, twice a year seems like a lot to go through.
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Jul 9, 2007 20:50:00 GMT -5
I'm leaning heavily toward once a year, with the end of the final vote coinciding near the release of the new set. However, a second class for this year only would be fine too. I'll hold off voting for a while.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon Breath on Jul 9, 2007 21:00:36 GMT -5
I voted for twice per year, mainly because I'm afraid that we will lose momentum on this effort if it "sits" for the next nine months.
Twice a year should allow for three months "on" to hold the two voting phases and perform any other tasks necessary to keep things running smoothly, followed by three months off.
|
|
|
Post by steefposton on Jul 10, 2007 1:22:34 GMT -5
I agree, once a year and it will fall off the face of the earth.
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jul 10, 2007 12:01:00 GMT -5
Heck, if we start averaging two people per cycle, then twice a year isn't really too many. I also agree that it might go stagnant if it's once a year.
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Jul 10, 2007 12:12:48 GMT -5
Twice a year, agreed. As time goes on, we could even see 1 or no people entering the HOF, so I think 2 a year is just fine
|
|
|
Post by Joe on Jul 11, 2007 18:30:14 GMT -5
Two voting cycles per year, mostly for the reasons stated.
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Jul 11, 2007 19:04:52 GMT -5
I also voted for 2 cycles per year, at least for now.
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jul 13, 2007 21:47:27 GMT -5
2 cycles per years should work fine.
|
|
|
Post by Wad on Jul 14, 2007 1:35:28 GMT -5
I preferred one cycle myself, but if there were 2, let's make the second for tag teams. Once a year, there'd be a singles induction and later on come tag teams.
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Jul 30, 2007 22:40:50 GMT -5
I like Wads idea.
|
|
|
Post by LWPD on Aug 5, 2007 16:48:06 GMT -5
Just a reminder...this poll will close on Thursday August 9th at 11:00 PST...majority vote determines direction.
|
|
|
Post by LWPD on Aug 10, 2007 3:03:51 GMT -5
The people have spoken. By way of majority vote there will be two CotG HOF cycles per year.
|
|