|
|
Post by The Doctor on Oct 31, 2007 14:53:00 GMT -5
In your fed, do you keep strictly to faces vs heels?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aquinas on Oct 31, 2007 15:02:05 GMT -5
I tend to keep to strict faces and heels, yes.....that's always been how I preferred wrestling to be in general. I'm not a big fan of "tweeners" (like HHH).
|
|
|
|
Post by PureHatred on Oct 31, 2007 15:28:01 GMT -5
Depends on the era.
In my re-launch, my fed is in the early stages of War Games and there is a clear cut division between heel and face. But the chracter are alitte more simplistic, too.
In my New Beginnings fed, where the characters are more complicated andt here's alitle more depthof personality, I tend to let that dictate the way a guy behaves rather than the concept of "heel" and "face."
|
|
|
|
Post by JMello on Oct 31, 2007 23:18:56 GMT -5
I stick to faces and heels, except on someone that is independent, for hire, or undetermined. Then they are allowed to face anyone. Sometimes faces will mix it up, for pride, or respect and heels will mix it up for supremecy, but mostly its faces vs. heels.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Oct 31, 2007 23:28:59 GMT -5
90% of my matches are hels vs. faces...but with a bunch of tweeners in the GWF these days its hard to always stick to that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Bri on Nov 1, 2007 0:59:35 GMT -5
I try to keep it face vs. heel for the most part, but if feuds develop over titles or anything else, I just let it roll.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Nov 1, 2007 1:29:06 GMT -5
I try to . But one problem who does an independent fight ? a face or a heel ?
|
|
|
|
Post by offspring515 on Nov 1, 2007 2:26:16 GMT -5
I'd say Independents are willing to fight anyone.
In my fed I have lots of face/face and heel/heel matches. It seems to fit in with current wrestling, and I figure the old "heel vs face" lines have blended anyhow.
|
|
|
|
Post by JimSteel on Nov 1, 2007 5:21:24 GMT -5
I mix it up with heels vs heels and faces for faces
Everyone fights everyone in my fed
|
|
|
|
Post by JED-SE on Nov 1, 2007 7:53:38 GMT -5
In recent years of the GWF, rather than Face vs heel, I stick to popular vs unpopular. Some independants are popular (ex - Divided We Fall, Gladiators) and other independants are un-popular (ex - Killprey, Sultans of Swagger) Normally, I will try to avoid matches like Genesis (Anivar and Tauran) vs Divided we fall, or The Troubleshooters vs Master Race. One of the exceptions to the rule is Vidtek vs The American Guy, because Tom has been setting it up for the last couple of years in the booklets.
|
|
|
|
Post by GrumpyBigBee on Nov 1, 2007 8:16:38 GMT -5
I try to but it rarely works out that way. But I try harder not to let people from the same "group" fight against each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Nov 1, 2007 14:52:12 GMT -5
no way hoss.
|
|
|
|
Post by MikeMcKinney on Nov 1, 2007 16:36:00 GMT -5
I'm a Faces and Heels Guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete on Nov 1, 2007 21:08:56 GMT -5
For the most part, yes. Exceptions are usually made for title matches, which I almost always award on merit rather than face-heel or feud dynamics. In my fed I try to keep it so that a quest for championships trump both friendships and personal grudges.
I also run annual round-robin singles and tag tournaments a la All-Japan and New Japan, which are driven mainly by the inevitable face-face and heel-heel matchups that result.
Incidentally, despite all this, I don't think I ever enjoyed playing a year more than 2103 when all the face and heel teams were feuding with each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by jawnrah on Nov 3, 2007 19:06:38 GMT -5
I mostly keep it heels vs faces yet lately I have unified my cruiserweight belt with the IP Belt and had to go heel vs heel to do so. And I use heel vs heel or face vs face for number one contender matches when I can't decide who I want to wrestle for titles at the next PPV. Or when the choice isn't obvious and for that purpose I don't mind doing heel vs heel or face vs face.
As for everyday matches there would have to be a good reason to book a heel vs heel or face vs face match.
|
|
