MISSION STATEMENT: What does trolling really mean?
Jul 10, 2007 10:54:38 GMT -5
Post by swarm on Jul 10, 2007 10:54:38 GMT -5
This is a serious discussion. I mean this.
What does the word trolling mean? Everything I know about it I learned from this board and this is what I know about it so far...
*I used to think it meant thinking one thing vs. a group of other people who have the same opinion as a mod or mods is trolling. Example: Thinking TNA sucks. The Tommy Brownell theory if you must...
*Liking Umaga. There was a time liking Umaga and hating Samoa Joe was considered trolling. Apparently now that it has been proved Umaga rules and Joe is coming to the WWE after sucking in TNA, this is no longer trolling.
*Sticking up for Tom. Being loyal to Tom and this game has been considered trolling. Apparently, it still is.
*Being responsible for others feelings. This is the one I have the most problem with. Why was MFT doing a bootleg of Joe not trolling? Because Joe didn't freak out and PM or email Chris complaining about it? It was surely done to troll Joe...but it didn't work. So that basically means if you don't fall for it, it's ok. How does that make sense?
(and for the record MFT has been cool since for the most part, just using this an an example...past is past not trying to bring it back up so it's not personal.)
Why was spattercat quoting one of Payback's quotes and putting in his sig not trolling? It was cleary done to get a rise out of Payback but he didn't care. Had he cared would splattercat been banned for trolling? Is that how it works...it's only trolling when you cry about it? Or is is because the same rules never applied to Joe and Payback...?
We are all adults here...and i think getting "worked up" or "irked" or "upset" or however you want to put it because of someone else's opinion or actions is really self destructive. For all the crap I take I never complain. I never cry. I never whine. Same can be said for Payback, Havoc, Joe, neily and a bunch of others...
I mean...the people who cry foul have ALWAYS been the ones fueling the fire and keep going until they are one upped so bad they turn to complaining and tattle-tailing to Chris. That's not being the victim of "trolling"...that's being able to dish it out but not take it.
This weekend for example. Non-conners want spoilers. We say no. They complain. So we give them spoilers. They read them. They realize it's a ruse. They get all upset and start name calling, flaming and bothering Chris. Chris threatens to suspend half the board (Tom too? He was at GCON too ya know).
All because of this stupid word: trolling. You know what trolling equates to from all I've learned?
Trolling = I am an adult and I just let another adult on a paper card wrestling game get me so upset I need to bother the mods and get this bad person banned for putting me in the position to allow myself to have my feelings (which I control) be affected. Even though I have the CHOICE to read what I want, when I want (The Hegemony/Ingersoll theory).
So I ask...is trolling nothing more than a tool used to threaten members of this board?
Based on Chris' own theory...NO ONE IS MAKING YOU READ THE THINGS we, or I, or anyone posts.
So you had the CHOICE not to read our swerve...does that only apply to me and others? But not Chris, Wildfire, Holland etc...
Because a fun prank orchestrated by EVERYONE at the Con turning into Chris throwing out threats to ban half the board including lovable Jim Steel is where the line is drawn. I mean...that's insane.
I am very confused and I think we, as a community need to come together and bury this stupid word reserved for children's toys forever and as a whole, lighten the hell up.
This is open to everyone...very serious and is intended to bring this board together if at all possible. I feel bad for all the people at the Con for having to deal with these threats and for all the people with little or no control over their feelings, mouse buttons, and what they do or do not read on this board.
Hopefully we can fix this for both sides of the ball.
Swarm
What does the word trolling mean? Everything I know about it I learned from this board and this is what I know about it so far...
*I used to think it meant thinking one thing vs. a group of other people who have the same opinion as a mod or mods is trolling. Example: Thinking TNA sucks. The Tommy Brownell theory if you must...
*Liking Umaga. There was a time liking Umaga and hating Samoa Joe was considered trolling. Apparently now that it has been proved Umaga rules and Joe is coming to the WWE after sucking in TNA, this is no longer trolling.
*Sticking up for Tom. Being loyal to Tom and this game has been considered trolling. Apparently, it still is.
*Being responsible for others feelings. This is the one I have the most problem with. Why was MFT doing a bootleg of Joe not trolling? Because Joe didn't freak out and PM or email Chris complaining about it? It was surely done to troll Joe...but it didn't work. So that basically means if you don't fall for it, it's ok. How does that make sense?
(and for the record MFT has been cool since for the most part, just using this an an example...past is past not trying to bring it back up so it's not personal.)
Why was spattercat quoting one of Payback's quotes and putting in his sig not trolling? It was cleary done to get a rise out of Payback but he didn't care. Had he cared would splattercat been banned for trolling? Is that how it works...it's only trolling when you cry about it? Or is is because the same rules never applied to Joe and Payback...?
We are all adults here...and i think getting "worked up" or "irked" or "upset" or however you want to put it because of someone else's opinion or actions is really self destructive. For all the crap I take I never complain. I never cry. I never whine. Same can be said for Payback, Havoc, Joe, neily and a bunch of others...
I mean...the people who cry foul have ALWAYS been the ones fueling the fire and keep going until they are one upped so bad they turn to complaining and tattle-tailing to Chris. That's not being the victim of "trolling"...that's being able to dish it out but not take it.
This weekend for example. Non-conners want spoilers. We say no. They complain. So we give them spoilers. They read them. They realize it's a ruse. They get all upset and start name calling, flaming and bothering Chris. Chris threatens to suspend half the board (Tom too? He was at GCON too ya know).
All because of this stupid word: trolling. You know what trolling equates to from all I've learned?
Trolling = I am an adult and I just let another adult on a paper card wrestling game get me so upset I need to bother the mods and get this bad person banned for putting me in the position to allow myself to have my feelings (which I control) be affected. Even though I have the CHOICE to read what I want, when I want (The Hegemony/Ingersoll theory).
So I ask...is trolling nothing more than a tool used to threaten members of this board?
Based on Chris' own theory...NO ONE IS MAKING YOU READ THE THINGS we, or I, or anyone posts.
So you had the CHOICE not to read our swerve...does that only apply to me and others? But not Chris, Wildfire, Holland etc...
Because a fun prank orchestrated by EVERYONE at the Con turning into Chris throwing out threats to ban half the board including lovable Jim Steel is where the line is drawn. I mean...that's insane.
I am very confused and I think we, as a community need to come together and bury this stupid word reserved for children's toys forever and as a whole, lighten the hell up.
This is open to everyone...very serious and is intended to bring this board together if at all possible. I feel bad for all the people at the Con for having to deal with these threats and for all the people with little or no control over their feelings, mouse buttons, and what they do or do not read on this board.
Hopefully we can fix this for both sides of the ball.
Swarm