|
|
Post by Bazzy on Jun 7, 2007 1:22:38 GMT -5
I heard the story on Fox News . In the USA (Oh yes only the USA) a judge sent his trousers to be cleaned at some cleaners/laundry . They have gone missing . Now the judge is sueing for damages worth $54,000,000 . Originally it was $64M but the judge has dropped $10M off the press tag .
"How much ?" and "What are they trousers made of ?"
|
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Jun 7, 2007 3:49:07 GMT -5
Glad you can see a fine example of how the American legal system is the greatest in the world.
|
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jun 7, 2007 7:22:59 GMT -5
I don't blame the judge, who wouldn't get PO'd if they lost these pants.  AHHHHHHH, it never gets old. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Aquinas on Jun 7, 2007 8:03:34 GMT -5
Those are HOT HOT HOT!
|
|
|
|
Post by Werner Mueck on Jun 7, 2007 8:14:37 GMT -5
I'm still kicking myself for not picking those up when I had the chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jun 7, 2007 8:46:21 GMT -5
I'm still kicking myself for not picking those up when I had the chance. Of course, who wouldn't want to get in Swarm's pants  |
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Jun 7, 2007 9:17:40 GMT -5
Of course, who wouldn't want to get in Swarm's pants I think you are on your own there Havoc...not that there's anything wrong with that. |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Jun 7, 2007 11:00:51 GMT -5
you wish.
|
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jun 7, 2007 11:04:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jun 7, 2007 11:11:38 GMT -5
I like that even better than invisible bike |
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Jun 10, 2007 17:17:53 GMT -5
 Here is a thought . So where are the trousers ? . Given to another customer ? . You find out when you get home , you've got the trousers . So the judge wants $54,000,000 damages . You say to the judge . If you give me $44,000,000 . YOU can have your pants back . ha ha  Seriously AINT it just cheaper , if he (or even the cleaning laudry company) buys a/him a new pair of trousers .
|
|
|
|
Post by Avarice on Jun 12, 2007 10:40:17 GMT -5
OMG BDS...that made my day....thanks for a good laugh bud. LMAO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Jun 12, 2007 11:10:17 GMT -5
Seriously AINT it just cheaper , if he (or even the cleaning laudry company) buys a/him a new pair of trousers . Ah, but that would be missing the point of dragging the judicial system into all this. It's the American Way®. We wouldn't expect you Tories to understand, what with the funny wigs you wear in court and all. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Jun 12, 2007 11:54:28 GMT -5
The "best" part about this story is that it's a JUDGE who is suing the cleaner. I guess he's not one of those "there are too many frivolous lawsuits" judges.
|
|
|
|
Post by offspring515 on Jun 12, 2007 15:09:57 GMT -5
Man I needs to get me a lawsuit in this guys court like, yesterday. THEY PUT TOO MANY ONIONS ON MY BIG MAC YO' HONOR! ISN'T 18 MILLION A FAIR PRICE FOR MY PAIN AND HUMILIATION?
|
|
Here is a thought . So where are the trousers ? . Given to another customer ? . You find out when you get home , you've got the trousers . So the judge wants $54,000,000 damages . You say to the judge . If you give me $44,000,000 . YOU can have your pants back . ha ha 
Seriously AINT it just cheaper , if he (or even the cleaning laudry company) buys a/him a new pair of trousers . 
