|
|
Post by GOODZILLA on Jan 29, 2008 17:29:43 GMT -5
This one goes out to my homies. Only participate if you are morally depraved. Have you ever wondered how many five year olds you could take on in a fight? Well wonder no more!! www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.comBy the way, I punked out 28 of the little [censored]. |
|
|
|
Post by darkrider on Jan 29, 2008 17:58:32 GMT -5
i could take out 16 of the little kids.
|
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Jan 29, 2008 18:01:20 GMT -5
29! Andy, we'd be a force!
|
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Jan 29, 2008 19:03:28 GMT -5
18. But I have a five-year-old, and sometimes I have trouble taking down just him!
|
|
|
|
Post by Chewey on Jan 30, 2008 6:43:55 GMT -5
I got 29 too, but I think it was only because I said I would use a five year old as a javelin against another five year old.
|
|
|
|
Post by behindthebook on Feb 4, 2008 16:37:06 GMT -5
30.
I'm both proud and ashamed at the same time.
|
|
|
|
Post by traviz on Feb 4, 2008 20:32:10 GMT -5
I can take out 22 before jobbing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Beck on Feb 4, 2008 22:50:40 GMT -5
22 here...i think it was becasue i chose the option that had my name in it for pete's sake!
|
|
|
|
Post by mikefortune on Feb 15, 2008 10:19:56 GMT -5
Yeah baby I could take on 33 before I was swarmed. I don't know how proud of this I should be but hey 33 is still a good ass kicking number.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Feb 18, 2008 18:37:54 GMT -5
I could take 28 according to this quiz.
|
|
|
|
Post by harmon on Feb 18, 2008 18:58:51 GMT -5
28 kids down for the count.
|
|
|
|
Post by Avarice on Feb 21, 2008 10:59:44 GMT -5
I got 20 that I could take on. I chose to use one as a battering ram if he attacked me first. Plus I also said that I would fight back just enough to win. I figured if I was swarmed and they took me down, that I wasn't gonna just lay there.  Where are these rabid little pecker gnats at anyhow? |
|
Where are these rabid little pecker gnats at anyhow? 