|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 10, 2007 20:40:12 GMT -5
I kind of think Orton AND Edge will both win but I didn't put that as an option.
|
|
|
|
Post by JMello on Mar 11, 2007 13:28:12 GMT -5
I was kind of thinking it'd be CM Punk and he'd be the first ever to use it at a shot at the ECW title, but I could also see Mr. Kennedy or Orton winning it.
I'm going with Orton, that'll incite a Orton/Edge feud over jealousy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Mar 11, 2007 16:56:33 GMT -5
What? No Carlito and Flair??? ;D
I like the Orton/Edge co-win idea, with the match to decide the breifcase happening at Backlash. However, I will go with my original thought and say Mr. Kennedy...just seems like they are angling him to win this. Edge and Orton could still face off at Backlash, when Orton costs Edge the match inadvertantly.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Mar 11, 2007 16:59:04 GMT -5
I also think it is going to be Orton with a match for the breifcase between Orton and Edge at Backlash.
|
|
|
|
Post by JED-SE on Mar 11, 2007 17:27:54 GMT -5
My heart once again will root for Matt Hardy, but I know it won't happen. I say Edge wins again.
|
|
|
|
Post by cakejedi on Mar 13, 2007 11:27:28 GMT -5
I think that whoever wins Money in the Bank will cash the contact in the same night. Why night use it on the biggest stage of the year?
My pick is Orton.
|
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Mar 13, 2007 12:03:42 GMT -5
edge of course. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Mar 13, 2007 12:40:12 GMT -5
Edge wins...he's never yet lost at Wrestlemania and most of his WM matches are not 1 on 1 (which will eventually put him Over taker)...It's impressive, and I hope they keep that going...
|
|
|
|
Post by Aquinas on Mar 13, 2007 12:45:57 GMT -5
I -hope- Finlay (or Booker T) win...but my gut feeling is Orton.
I really hope they don't prolong Edge's streak for the sake of prolonging it. One streak is sufficient. It takes away any element of surprise if multiple guys are sure-thing victors simply because of streaks.
I hope Edge loses just to put the streak to bed. I think the guy is awesome....just not the streak.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Mar 13, 2007 14:46:58 GMT -5
As much as I think Edge's WM streak is weak, I think they'll keep it going for at least one more year.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 13, 2007 16:18:59 GMT -5
Why is it weak.
|
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Mar 13, 2007 17:57:41 GMT -5
I think it doesn't have the mystique that 'Taker's has...What taker has done has been awesome except for a couple exceptions (Giant Gonzales, but really, how can you help that?)...Taker/Batista is going to be awesome... (by the way Swarm, I AM getting Wrestlemania, just so you know...there are some things even *I* won't miss  )... With Edge, I wouldn't say his streak is weak by any means...Except for his Matches against Booker T and Mick Foley (in a freakin' Hardcore match!!), all his WM matches have had 5 other guys in them...Myself I think that's impressive... Right now though, he's 5-0...Maybe that's why it looks 'weak'...Give him 10 years...  |
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Mar 13, 2007 18:13:48 GMT -5
Mr. Kennedy.
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Mar 13, 2007 21:36:41 GMT -5
I'm voting for Kennedy. If Edge hadn't won it before, I'd pick him. Personally I exppect Edge and Orton to cost each other the shot
|
|
|
|
Post by JimSteel on Mar 13, 2007 21:40:25 GMT -5
Kennedy
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 13, 2007 22:02:14 GMT -5
I'd like to see Kennedy win and move to RAW and become a huge star. Pleeeeeeaaaaaseeee.
|
|
|
|
Post by jester on Mar 14, 2007 0:16:39 GMT -5
I'd love to see Punk but won't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by theringmaster on Mar 14, 2007 5:15:05 GMT -5
I think it will be Kennedy or Orton I think those are the only two possibles. Edge won't win it again can't see that happening and don't think his streak ending is really a consideration although I could be wrong. The ending of his streak should be another catalyst in the upcoming feud between Orton and Edge so I choose Orton. Edge will regain the title soon after Mania and Orton and Edge will happen soon thereafter for the title maybe Summerslam.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Mar 14, 2007 9:48:23 GMT -5
Because several of those matches were tag matches, so Christian did some of the work. All of Taker's matches were one-on-one (including the one that was supposed to be a tag match). |
|
|
|
Post by Splattercat on Mar 14, 2007 11:44:02 GMT -5
Ah, I looked at it from the other side...Technically, a 3 team tables and TLC match is "handicap"...Kinda...They were outnumbered...Both guys had to keep an eye on at least 2 other guys...And then Money in the Bank of course...I think it would be impressive if he won MitB again...
|
|
)...
