|
|
Post by Bazzy on Mar 3, 2007 3:41:02 GMT -5
With 8 contenders been in this year's WWE Money In The Bank match at Wrestlemania . How many contender do you think should be in the match ?
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Mar 3, 2007 9:20:17 GMT -5
I prefer 6. 8 is a bit much.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 3, 2007 13:14:48 GMT -5
8.
|
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Mar 3, 2007 18:25:42 GMT -5
I'll say six.
|
|
|
|
Post by gatekeeper on Mar 5, 2007 10:28:33 GMT -5
I say 6.
2 from each brand.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hegemony on Mar 6, 2007 16:54:18 GMT -5
Next year if they go back to six I wonder if Swarm would say that six is the appropriate number of competitors in MITB.  He is loyal though, I have to give him that, even though it will be a pleasure to throw him from the Board Royal Rumble. |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 6, 2007 17:01:00 GMT -5
Next year if they go back to six I wonder if Swarm would say that six is the appropriate number of competitors in MITB. He is loyal though, I have to give him that, even though it will be a pleasure to throw him from the Board Royal Rumble. ok you tell me who should they take out then. |
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Mar 6, 2007 17:01:30 GMT -5
i chose 4 and swarm knows who will fight to keep him in the rumble.can you say the same ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hegemony on Mar 6, 2007 17:04:07 GMT -5
i chose 4 and swarm knows who will fight to keep him in the rumble.can you say the same ? I shall spit on your carcass when I am finished throwing you over the top in the Rumble, IF you even make it that far. |
|
|
|
Post by Hegemony on Mar 6, 2007 17:05:21 GMT -5
Next year if they go back to six I wonder if Swarm would say that six is the appropriate number of competitors in MITB. He is loyal though, I have to give him that, even though it will be a pleasure to throw him from the Board Royal Rumble. ok you tell me who should they take out then. Maybe they should have put some of these competent wrestlers in a SINGLES match rather than overloading a match that is going to rely on gimmicks such as ladders. I actually like good wrestling on my $50 PPV shows. |
|
|
|
Post by Aquinas on Mar 6, 2007 17:05:27 GMT -5
I said 6....purely out of personal preference, I'd take the Hardys out. I think they are talented, but boring as singles stars.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 6, 2007 18:35:25 GMT -5
ok you tell me who should they take out then. Maybe they should have put some of these competent wrestlers in a SINGLES match rather than overloading a match that is going to rely on gimmicks such as ladders. I actually like good wrestling on my $50 PPV shows. Have you seen either of the two previous MITB matches? |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 10, 2007 20:37:02 GMT -5
Yeah I didn't think so.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hegemony on Mar 10, 2007 21:04:26 GMT -5
Sorry, got sidetracked a bit. Yes, I have seen both of them and they were both quite good (specifically the first one). My point was simply that by putting all of your best workers in one match (especially now that there are 8 and not just 6) you are limiting the rest of your card's ability to have great matches. And the ladder stipulation only helps lesser workers hide their weaknesses, so many of the better competitors in these matches don't need to rely on such gimmickry. Edit - and unlike you I actually watch something before I tear it apart |
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 10, 2007 22:29:02 GMT -5
I've seen as much ROH as you. It sucks. It's a spotfest with regular looking people. Lame.
|
|
|
|
Post by jester on Mar 11, 2007 7:47:05 GMT -5
4
Take out Fit Finlay- Great worker but not built for a match of this kind.
Booker T ( KING Booka ) - He gonna drag this match down.
Both Hardy Boyz - Even though they're gonna be spectacular in a match like this , everyone knows they're not going to win. The double W E will never push either in the main event for a hwt. title. sad but true.
8 is way too many IMO
|
|
