|
|
Post by canadianpittbull on Nov 3, 2006 12:13:35 GMT -5
I think there could be some conflict with the whole Kane and ManKane=Abyss. I think he should retire and be done with it but if he went to TNA I wouldn't disagree either. (if they could create a decent gimmick or angle for him.)
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Nov 3, 2006 12:31:54 GMT -5
lol Kane would never go to TNA...
|
|
|
|
Post by tafkaga on Nov 3, 2006 18:40:49 GMT -5
TNA doesn't need Kane and Kane doesn't need TNA. Agree. No reason for Kane to go to TNA that I can think of unless he just wanted to work on a reduced schedule and still be on TV. I don't see him being a big name outside of WWE and the Kane gimmick either. TNA either needs to get a second hour or stop buying old wrestlers who are past or nearing the ends of their prime. I don't want to see Kane, Scott Steiner, Goldberg, and guys like that. I want to see some home grown main event talent. I make exceptions for Sting because he's a legend who has still got a few good years left probably, and Angle for the same reason. |
|
|
|
Post by gatekeeper on Nov 3, 2006 19:03:26 GMT -5
He should just retire.
TNA should be pushing their young guys. Putting Kane in there would just set up yet another roadblock for them.
|
|
