|
Post by Bazzy on Oct 12, 2006 0:50:24 GMT -5
With Kane leaving Raw . I was just wondering should TNA get him ?
|
|
|
Post by thefamoustommyz on Oct 12, 2006 1:09:05 GMT -5
Well, two problems with that poll...one, I'm pretty sure he's still under WWE contract and two, I'm also pretty sure he's said he sees himself as a wrestler and not an actor...and thus, isn't getting too worried about making more movies.
|
|
|
Post by theace4ever on Oct 12, 2006 1:11:51 GMT -5
Im thinking maybe he will head to Smackdown for one last tussle with Taker...who knows
|
|
|
Post by gwffantrav on Oct 12, 2006 1:13:07 GMT -5
Tommy hit it on the head.
|
|
|
Post by spiderbite on Oct 12, 2006 2:23:43 GMT -5
I was suprised to here he was coming back at all. I know he was mentioning hanging em up soon, so I assumed this was that time. I think Smackdown could really benefit from having him on their show until he is finally ready to retire though.
|
|
|
Post by vansabu on Oct 12, 2006 9:34:56 GMT -5
I saw a shoot where he said he wants to work with Taker again before retirement, so I think that is why he has stuck around.
|
|
|
Post by Mad Dog on Oct 12, 2006 9:46:54 GMT -5
I don't know. I don't think he's a good fit size wise for TNA.
|
|
|
Post by bmurderh8s on Oct 12, 2006 12:12:35 GMT -5
Kane doesn't belong in a TNA. He and TNA should stay far away from each other.
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Oct 12, 2006 14:31:25 GMT -5
He's probably too tall for TNA (same as Matt Morgan) Also, it looks like they're moving him to Smackdown.
|
|
|
Post by ewt on Oct 12, 2006 16:16:27 GMT -5
His body type and style don't seem to fit the TNA brand. Kane is a HUGE name but Glen Jacobs is not. I assume that WWE still has the rights to his name as well as every other word in the english language.
|
|
|
Post by Vidtek on Oct 12, 2006 18:16:53 GMT -5
I actually don't want to see Kane in TNA. Mostly for two reasons. One, I don't want the TNA haters to start going off on what a moron Kane is blahblahblah. Two, it would lead to the end of my favorite wrestler in TNA, ABYSS. Think of it, he's unfortunatly very close to being a mix of Mankind and Kane, you bring in one of hte original insperations for the consept and now what's the point. I like ABYSS and James Mitchael. I don't wnat to see them buried becasue TNA gets a hold of a "real" monster. That's just me though. Big Time
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Oct 13, 2006 2:03:20 GMT -5
I did hear Kane's saved his money (not drank or smoked it away) . His got hip trouble , giving him trouble walking . He plans to retire soon .
|
|
|
Post by MikeMcKinney on Oct 13, 2006 13:21:39 GMT -5
he's done.... hope he retires.
|
|
|
Post by Omen on Oct 14, 2006 14:16:22 GMT -5
No one here thought of ECW?...He could get a title shot at Big Show...That would look better the RVD vs Show!!
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Oct 14, 2006 14:19:19 GMT -5
No one here thought of ECW?...He could get a title shot at Big Show...That would look better the RVD vs Show!! Kane and the Big Show just had a short feud a few months ago on RAW about the time that Kane's movie came out and I did not think then were that great (the ending to their match at Backlash I thought was the worst ending of a match on a WWE PPV this entire year). Anyways, we now know for sure that Kane is on Smackdown after his match against MVP last night.
|
|
|
Post by Omen on Oct 14, 2006 14:23:55 GMT -5
Did not see last night...Still the way they move players around he could still do ECW...And that feud was not worked right anyway...Heyman would do a better job at it...
|
|
|
Post by pikemojo on Oct 18, 2006 17:21:50 GMT -5
I loved the match where Big Show and Kane went at it where they wrestled a really "technical" match. They used only holds and arm twists and such. It was the funniest thing I had seen in recent memory. Plus Kane has already had one shot at the ECW title.
|
|
|
Post by Avarice on Oct 21, 2006 23:06:52 GMT -5
I say just let him retire...TNA is good, and don't need him if he's becoming "washed up." Adam said it right, TNA has Abyss, and we don't need to mess with the "Monster" chemistry by bringing Kane in.
|
|
|
Post by ravenkai on Oct 25, 2006 19:49:03 GMT -5
Yes I do Agree with you there, Let him retire and relax with making some of his fans in the film industry..
|
|
|
Post by daytondave on Nov 2, 2006 23:59:13 GMT -5
TNA doesn't need Kane and Kane doesn't need TNA.
|
|