|
|
Post by Bazzy on Mar 16, 2006 1:42:15 GMT -5
After hearing Edge mention on RAW his unbeaten run at Wrestlemania . I don't know if that is true or not ? . If it is why not a inter-match between two winning runs Edge v Undertaker ? . I mean who wants to see Undie v Mark Henry in a Casket match ?
|
|
|
|
Post by gwffantrav on Mar 16, 2006 4:28:43 GMT -5
I'd like to see it....you know UT is going to win along with Edge. They will probably build towards that next year...
|
|
|
|
Post by soug on Mar 16, 2006 18:35:35 GMT -5
I used to think the Undertaker was cool....now he bores me.
I'd like to see Edge beat the crap out of him. Will it happen? NO! Taker never puts anyone over!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Mar 17, 2006 10:01:15 GMT -5
If the two of them were to meet at WM, with the "undefeated vs. undefeated" thing on the line, I think that Taker will finally lose.
For the record, Edge's "undefeated at WM" streak is spotty at best. His first WM was WM2K, which featured Edge and Christian winning TLC. At WM21, they also won TLC2. The following year, he beat Booker T. Then a series of well-timed injuries kept him out of Wrestlemania until last year, when he won MITB.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Bri on Mar 17, 2006 10:04:20 GMT -5
For the record, Edge's "undefeated at WM" streak is spotty at best. His first WM was WM2K, which featured Edge and Christian winning TLC. At WM21, they also won TLC2. The following year, he beat Booker T. Then a series of well-timed injuries kept him out of Wrestlemania until last year, when he won MITB. How is that spotty? It's pretty cut and dry: the guy has never lost at WM. Sure, it's only 4 wins, but he's still undefeated. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on Mar 17, 2006 11:50:35 GMT -5
First, two corrections to what I typed earlier: the match at WM2K wasn't TLC, it was just "Tables and Ladders". The chairs weren't added until Summerslam that year. Secondly, I mistyped "WM21" for TLC2 when I meant WMX7" (the 2 in WM2K confused me).
Edge's streak four wins, two as part of a tag team, spread out over six years (he missed two WMs back-to-back thanks to his injuries). Also, the two tag wins weren't pinfall/submission victories due to the ladder-nature of the match; even if E&C hadn't won those matches, he could still claim that he's never been pinned at WM. We'll ignore the technicality of which member of E&C actually won each TLC match by grabbing the belts; the fact is that in singles contests at WM, Edge is a whopping 2-0. That's hardly a streak.
UTs streak, OTOH, is thirteen wins, all singles matches (save for one handicap match that should have been a tag match), spread out over fifteen years; he missed only WMX and WM2K (WM16). Of those thirteen wins, one has been by DQ (vs. Giant Gonzales, WM9); the other twelve have all been pinfall. Strangely, his upcoming match with Mark Henry will be the first Casket Match in WM history (unless you want to count the Dumpster Match, which is debateable).
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Bri on Mar 18, 2006 19:05:55 GMT -5
We'll have to agree to disagree here. But if for some reason Edge loses at WM, we won't have to debate it anymore  |
|
|
|
Post by GrumpyBigBee on Mar 21, 2006 16:35:58 GMT -5
is anyone else tired of UK?
|
|
|
|
Post by thefamoustommyz on Mar 22, 2006 15:47:12 GMT -5
I am...
Damned United Kingdom makes me sick.
*ahem*
Sorry...=)
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Mar 22, 2006 16:16:52 GMT -5
If Edge didn't win this match it would be a crime. There is not one good reason for UT to not eventually lose at WM to someone. I think Edge would be perfect.
|
|
|
|
Post by nelson on Mar 22, 2006 16:20:43 GMT -5
of course it would be perfect for vince to let undertaker win grr.  |
|
