|
|
Post by Bazzy on Nov 13, 2006 6:02:17 GMT -5
There has been various threads about wrestlers already in sets , that also played a different gimmick . Tom has already done some with Jimmy Valiant & Ted Dibiase . Jim Steel talked about an alternative to Virgil . Just wondering if there was an alternative set . A.K.A (Also Known As) , would you buy it ? .
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Nov 13, 2006 9:25:32 GMT -5
Why not. A set of them would probably lessen the need to include them in full sets and seveal have had alternative IDs that could probably find use.
|
|
|
|
Post by hofclemens on Nov 13, 2006 15:59:06 GMT -5
if it had a lot of guys with completely different personalities. I mean for instance if Brad Armstrong could be Badstreet or his spidey ripoff.( i realize they might not be able to use him now because of his WWE commitment but he was the first that popped into my head).
So I guess basicaly if it featured a lot of guys like Bob Armstrong or Brody under their masked gimmicks I might go for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Nov 13, 2006 16:01:00 GMT -5
I fully support anything Tom puts his time into. 100%
|
|
|
|
Post by inquisator2 on Nov 13, 2006 18:20:56 GMT -5
Like Swarm Says I will buy any set Tom produces without question....
personally i would like to have 1 or 2 per set instead of a whole set of AKA........
I enjoyed getting Mid-South Dibiase.......but its still all about the new guys...
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Nov 13, 2006 20:08:06 GMT -5
It's a real split. You'll have those who want them all in one set(in case they don't want to get the set) and those who will want them interspersed so more new guys will come.
|
|
|
|
Post by pikemojo on Nov 13, 2006 21:59:20 GMT -5
I would buy it but I probably wouldn't use any of them. I would rather have a set of jobbers or midgets or something. Any new wrestler over a redo of someone we already have.
|
|
|
|
Post by blueraider2 on Nov 13, 2006 22:13:42 GMT -5
i voted no.i mean why get cards you already have?
|
|
|
|
Post by gwffantrav on Nov 13, 2006 22:35:01 GMT -5
I'd rather have them as SE cards....but I'd buy everyone of them up!
|
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Nov 13, 2006 22:49:07 GMT -5
If we ever had an AKA set, I would buy it and probably even preorder it- just like I preorder all of the Legends stuff that comes out. But, to be honest, I would prefer that the alter ego cards be periodically included in the sets containing mostly new wrestlers.
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Nov 13, 2006 23:17:32 GMT -5
It does make me wonder though how many more sets are out there. Seems some of the wells are drying up.
|
|
|
|
Post by gwffantrav on Nov 13, 2006 23:52:33 GMT -5
Troy...I've given Tom tons of signings. I know a few others have...but I hope he hasn't been burned out
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Nov 14, 2006 12:11:15 GMT -5
Troy...I've given Tom tons of signings. I know a few others have...but I hope he hasn't been burned out There are still TONS of guys out there(including some huge names), so I seriously doubt that LOW is going anywhere. |
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Nov 14, 2006 12:16:39 GMT -5
No doubt, LOW will keep on going and get bigger and better. There are a ton of avenues that still haven't been explored yet.
As for the topic at hand, I don't think that an AKA set would do as well as a normal set. I think that having 1 or 2 show up in a regular set (aka Mid-South DiBiase, Boogie Woogie Man, Killer Kowalski) and the occassional SE card with a different persona is a better route to go.
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Nov 14, 2006 13:22:33 GMT -5
Well th ere are a lot of guys out there for sure......and I admit I'm up for a lot of them, but a lot of the guys who could headline a set seem to be falling to the wayside. At G-Con, the top guy is a tag wrestler.......it's not the same as when the top guys for the next set were say the Midnights with Cornette. I'm hoping it is, I'm just worried that it isn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by GrumpyBigBee on Dec 5, 2006 13:17:15 GMT -5
Ive already said something about this and agree it should and could happen...
|
|
