|
|
Post by bauermann on Jun 30, 2007 3:45:21 GMT -5
Who`s better?
|
|
|
|
Post by bauermann on Jun 30, 2007 3:47:32 GMT -5
Dark Star Creature (GWFZ).
|
|
|
|
Post by tombraider on Jun 30, 2007 5:20:57 GMT -5
the gwfz one.
|
|
|
|
Post by steefposton on Jun 30, 2007 10:44:26 GMT -5
no idea
|
|
|
|
Post by Pete Beck on Jun 30, 2007 23:19:37 GMT -5
didn't the first DSC have a problem finding the ring?
|
|
|
|
Post by bauermann on Jun 30, 2007 23:39:39 GMT -5
didn't the first DSC have a problem finding the ring? He is easy to pin. When the referee pounds the mat for a three-count, instead of kicking out the Dark Star Creature often looks over at the referee and watches. In cage matches he forgets to keep the opponent from leaving and watches him climb out. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jun 30, 2007 23:49:27 GMT -5
Nothing against the new version, but I like the original a little better.
|
|
|
|
Post by gatekeeper on Jul 1, 2007 23:06:10 GMT -5
GWFZ DSC
|
|
|
|
Post by Aquinas on Jul 1, 2007 23:31:38 GMT -5
GWFZ
|
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Jul 2, 2007 10:07:53 GMT -5
Kanyon.
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Jul 2, 2007 10:23:58 GMT -5
DSCZ but they're both cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thad Killian on Jul 2, 2007 11:08:21 GMT -5
As a dedication to DS...have to go with the King of the Cage...
|
|
|
|
Post by MikeMcKinney on Jul 2, 2007 13:39:41 GMT -5
GWFZ is better.
|
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Jul 4, 2007 21:10:43 GMT -5
Zone DSC
|
|
|
|
Post by Holland227 on Aug 12, 2007 8:50:57 GMT -5
I havent seen the GWFZ DSC. I did like the Classics one. He was a blast to play with. TOugh Defense, bad offense
|
|
|
|
Post by JMello on Aug 12, 2007 9:08:18 GMT -5
Hands down the one from the Z is better, a better poll would be which is your favorite? I haven't started a Z yet, so I couldn't answer that, but stat wise the Z has it.
|
|
