Rankings screen for Cotgonline

[Wildfire]

Here's the possibilities I came up with:

1) Same as it is now, but with a 'C' or a title belt graphic next to the champ.

2) The champ is listed 1st, then 1-10 after, so it would look like this:

aCe Champ: Ventross (140 points)
1) Murdok (176 points)
2) Aegis (135 points)

etc.

3) As #2, but with the points not shown for the champ

[jefft]

Number #2 is best.

[toasterboy]

I voted 2 just because why not have the points? Since they are there already, it would seem like less work to just leave them than to remove them. But I'm no coder.

[BDS]

Whichever one I decide works best with the changes I make to the title system.

[incognito]

Anyway's fine; but I'll say #2

[jefft]

bigdaddyswank said:

Whichever one I decide works best with the changes I make to the title system.

We need a 'whatever the heck BDS wants' as an option. ;D

[Wildfire]

bigdaddyswank said:

Whichever one I decide works best with the changes I make to the title system.

I thought this might help you decide what was best...

you do want us to be happy, don't you? Since you're still deciding, I thought this might help you decide

If you got a plan, do tell, its altogether possible I'll like yours better anyway.

Really, #2 and #3 are very similar, so if the early results hold and those are the two favored options, either would be fine with me.

I picked #3, just because it would mildly annoy me to see the champ with a rating lower than anyone, but that's just a silly thing really

[BDS]

I will try to make y'all as happy with the title system as possible. I'm just not happy with a couple of things about it right now, and there are some changes that I'm going to have to make for it long term to make things I've got planned work properly. This is just one of those things that's going to have to bow to mechanics in the big picture, I'm afraid.

And for the record, my real vote is #2 with the championship belts.

[cyclehog2121]

wildfire said:

bigdaddyswank said:

Whichever one I decide works best with the changes I make to the title system.

I picked #3, just because it would mildly annoy me to see the champ with a rating lower than anyone, but that's just a silly thing really

I agree, sometimes fluke wins or storylines dictate low grade champions and who wants to see them with lower points.

[BDS]

From a fluff perspective, I can actually see that point of view. If Lance is the champion, nobody's going to vote for him in the #1 contender rankings - he's the champion. Personally, I'd like to see the numbers, but I could be swayed by a mass outpouring for #3. Let the voting continue!

[steefposton]

Hadn't thought of this before now, but does the stat tracker just have 1 champion or can you list (and name) the belts you want for your fed?

[MikeMcKinney]

#2 is cool.

[kevink]

I think suggestion 2 is a good fit