|
|
Post by theringmaster on Feb 5, 2007 12:10:54 GMT -5
Quick question... In one of the bash's there is a Krakan card and in Classic 3000 there is an Actagon card just wondering if it is the same old card to fill in storyline/set or if it is a new drawing or anything. My appreciations!
|
|
|
|
Post by Minotaur on Feb 5, 2007 12:16:59 GMT -5
the Krakan card is just a different drawing (i think...). If there are any changes, they would be minor changes.
The Classics 3000 Actagon card is a DIFFERENT card....same Actagon, different card, drawing and stats/moves....
Chris
|
|
|
|
Post by theringmaster on Feb 5, 2007 12:21:08 GMT -5
excellence! I thank you!
|
|
|
|
Post by jester on Feb 5, 2007 12:46:32 GMT -5
Actagon is worth getting.......IMO  |
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Feb 5, 2007 12:57:20 GMT -5
Yes, the Actagon 3000 card is nice as is his tag partner Rune Larrs.
|
|
|
|
Post by theringmaster on Feb 5, 2007 12:59:14 GMT -5
Sounds great! It will also be gotten!
|
|
|
|
Post by LWPD on Feb 8, 2007 20:59:44 GMT -5
Quick question... In one of the bash's there is a Krakan card and in Classic 3000 there is an Actagon card just wondering if it is the same old card to fill in storyline/set or if it is a new drawing or anything. My appreciations! Ringmaster...here's a stat gauge directly from Lord Rahl's Character Ratings...looks like Actagon drops a bit: Birthday Bash Invincible Krakan 34 (37)Classics 3000 Actagon 24 (36) -7/-5
LWPD (Lord Rahl's contributions are a great asset for answering game-play questions like this...especially across game editions)
|
|
