|
|
Post by soug on Feb 3, 2006 22:51:37 GMT -5
I was looking at all the top guys in the GWF, CPC and aCe. I thought to myself, " man , we could have just 1 super federation!"
Or would that be less fun than having 3 federations?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bazzy on Feb 4, 2006 2:31:09 GMT -5
Never become 1 , just look at the WWE now . Competition makes it much better .
|
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Feb 4, 2006 2:54:57 GMT -5
I prefer the three separate feds. For me, sometimes it is easier to be creative and also use everyone regularly if I don't have a roster as large as something like the WWF combined with the NWA and AWA in the mid to late 1980s.
|
|
|
|
Post by offspring515 on Feb 4, 2006 14:04:54 GMT -5
I think lots of people don't like having so much parity in the GWF. by combining the top guys from 3 feds into one, there would be nothing but main eventers. I say 3 feds is the way to go!
|
|
|
|
Post by Big Bri on Feb 4, 2006 16:32:21 GMT -5
3 federations but maybe a fed vs. fed vs. fed PPV every few years to give the fans the thrill of a lifetime.
|
|
|
|
Post by soug on Feb 4, 2006 17:41:43 GMT -5
3 federations but maybe a fed vs. fed vs. fed PPV every few years to give the fans the thrill of a lifetime. my final card of the year is the GWF vs CPC.and there have been some interesting results |
|
|
|
Post by gatekeeper on Feb 6, 2006 0:10:25 GMT -5
Never become 1 , just look at the WWE now . Competition makes it much better . Couldn't agree more. |
|
|
|
Post by Pete Beck on Feb 6, 2006 21:20:46 GMT -5
Never become 1 , just look at the WWE now . Competition makes it much better . Couldn't agree more. agreed...gotta have some competition... |
|
|
|
Post by GrumpyBigBee on Feb 9, 2006 10:40:00 GMT -5
break em up into many good sized feds... too big of a fed can cause many many bad match ups like Pollux and Metor.
|
|
