|
|
Post by BDS on Jul 12, 2006 23:17:01 GMT -5
SPOILERS ahead, next 4 miles. Expect delays. Have a nice day.
Okay, I've got a couple of questions about how Aegis' BattleGear rule works in a couple of situations:
Can we pretend that he's a Ravager, IPU, etc? For example, can we pretend he's a zombie and make NUCLEAR WINTER a (+1) instead of a (+3)?
If that's a yes, then do we likewise pretend he's a Ravager when rolling on the Trisis chart? (This would rule!)
Finally, what about GUILTY OF TREASON? Does it become a (0)?
I think that the answer to all of these is "yes," but I want to make sure I'm not reading or understanding Osk's intent incorrectly.
|
|
|
|
Post by krisosk on Jul 13, 2006 0:29:59 GMT -5
Daddy,
The answer is YES to all the questions posed.
~ :-Xsk
|
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jul 13, 2006 6:15:54 GMT -5
GLEENew Aegis rocks, Osk. Downgrade shmowngrade. My fed needs Aegis running around in BattleGear yelling "You can't kill me" and actually meaning it. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jul 13, 2006 10:03:15 GMT -5
Agreed BDS, this battle armor is PERFECT for your fed, hmm I wonder if you had anything do do with it. BTW, not sure if anyone pointed this out to you, Mr. Osk, but the word "special" is mispelled (two different wrong ways, no less) in the fine print.. feel free to correct it and make our cards "super special error limited edition) ones  |
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Jul 13, 2006 13:02:54 GMT -5
While his finisher may miss a little more often, he's going to be doing a lot better I think and will be the class of his team from now on.
|
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jul 13, 2006 14:07:34 GMT -5
No way! The class of the ROC is and will remain Lance At-Las! Or maybe that's just in my fed ...
In any event, I can't lay any claim to making SE Aegis as cool as he is. I'm just lucky that he fits so well into my fed. I can't wait to read about the story behind the armor so I can figure out how to work him in.
SE Murdok's going in following my next card, though. I'm actually rewriting the end of the card specifically to bring it about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Jul 14, 2006 11:48:17 GMT -5
Daddy, The answer is YES to all the questions posed. Hey, Osk, don't you love it when someone does all the grunt work for you and all you have to do is say, "Yup"? Me, too. |
|
|
|
Post by krisosk on Jul 14, 2006 13:19:02 GMT -5
Daddy, The answer is YES to all the questions posed. Hey, Osk, don't you love it when someone does all the grunt work for you and all you have to do is say, "Yup"? Me, too. Yup. ~ :-Xsk |
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Jul 14, 2006 15:05:23 GMT -5
And that's why I like him, ladies and gentlemen. I set him up, he knocks me down.
|
|
|
|
Post by krisosk on Jul 14, 2006 17:46:18 GMT -5
;D
~ :-Xsk
|
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jul 29, 2006 12:05:00 GMT -5
Okay, Osk, I've got another one for you.
Is the special ability on Godsend's SPEAK OF THE DEVIL considered "excessive damage" and thereby blocked by the BattleGear?
|
|
|
|
Post by traviz on Jul 30, 2006 14:40:13 GMT -5
Is it me or is Aegis armor look to be based on Boba Fett's?
|
|
|
|
Post by krisosk on Jul 31, 2006 17:37:35 GMT -5
Is it me or is Aegis armor look to be based on Boba Fett's? Looks that way to me too, Trav. ~ :-Xsk |
|
|
|
Post by krisosk on Jul 31, 2006 17:42:15 GMT -5
Is the special ability on Godsend's SPEAK OF THE DEVIL considered "excessive damage" and thereby blocked by the BattleGear? I thought this one might come up. Nah, I don't consider the effect (or is it affect?) of SPEAK OF THE DEVIL to be a "damage" move. Godsend's SotD is a different kind (first of it's kind maybe?) of game mechanic. Especially being that it's not suffered until the next card. You guys agree here? ~ :-Xsk |
|
|
|
Post by gamemaster on Jul 31, 2006 17:50:47 GMT -5
Yes sir!
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Jul 31, 2006 18:45:09 GMT -5
Yeah. No reason the armor should be able to protect against it in my mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jul 31, 2006 22:24:20 GMT -5
Thank you, Osk!
|
|
