|
|
Post by JMello on Oct 26, 2006 0:07:42 GMT -5
Ok, I really want to get my fed going, but I'm having trouble incorporating everything I want to include. Obviously I want to follow story lines, but I also want to track Wins, Losses, Titles(Won/Defenses) and their Stroke(using the Rahl system, I believe). It needs to be rather basic and should emphasize what they've done over the past 3 months, more so then in their entire career, although that needs to have some say in the matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by JimSteel on Oct 26, 2006 6:30:23 GMT -5
I have found a point system works best for rankings
Here is the one I use
WINS
Pinfalls or submissions-5 Points
DQ Wins-3 Points
Count Out Win-2 Points
DRAW-1 Point
OTHER
Title Win-10 Points
Successful Title Defense-7 Points
Beating the Champion(Non Title,DQ,etc)-6 Points
Specialty Match-6 Points
|
|
|
|
Post by JMello on Oct 26, 2006 9:58:49 GMT -5
Mr. Steel, do you give out any - points, like for a loss or anything? Do you just start at zero or do you start with a "stroke" rating?
|
|
|
|
Post by backincali444 on Oct 26, 2006 14:34:22 GMT -5
I do a similar points system. Although, I give out negative points for losses. -1 for pin or submission, -2 for d.q. or countout.....etc.
This way, when it comes to title matches....wrestlers have to have a positive point total to even be considered for a title match.
I'm still in my first "game year" and it's been working great. At my year end PPV event, I will hold a match between the two wrestlers at the bottom of the point standings. It will be a loser-leave-GWF match.
Anyway, I agree that a point system works the best for rankings.
|
|
|
|
Post by GrumpyBigBee on Oct 27, 2006 10:06:52 GMT -5
Ive done the points thing but I would assign negative points for a loss also. Now I do the win/loss system. BUT I pick the challengers for the title matches and I try to keep in mind how people can have better records if they beat up on the chumps and some have bad records but because they have fought all top wrestlers.
|
|
