|
Post by GOODZILLA on Nov 8, 2006 12:59:52 GMT -5
This is all crazy talk. The Greek Gods were good for me up until about 2092 .... because by then the Gladiators were updated, the Cosmic Forces and Keepers of the Stone (very underrated team!!!) were around, and the Greek Gods just couldn't keep up with them.
I did use both Proteus and Actagon in singles matches and, although Proteus won a few bouts, Actagon was basically a jobber.
|
|
|
Post by Holland227 on Nov 8, 2006 13:41:30 GMT -5
Actagon Heel turn is the way to go. I can picture the crowd slowly booing him and cheering Proteus and Wolf
|
|
|
Post by theamazingbadger on Nov 9, 2006 1:45:43 GMT -5
I've recently restarted 2087 and the Greek Gods have been a reasonably good tag team for me. They won the tag team tournament and they were the only tag team the Gladiators weren't able to defeat. On top of that, they put Brute in the hospital for like six days. On the other hand, in thier first title defence they lost the titles to Executioner and Ghengis Khan. Also, Actagon has yet to win a match in singles competition and Proteus has only one once. It pains me to say that only Death Knight is doing worse in singles competition then Actagon is right now, at least in my fed.
|
|
|
Post by kthcompton on Nov 12, 2006 10:25:52 GMT -5
In my fed the Greek Gods won the Tag Titles from The Society of Death, only to lose the titles the next week to the Gladiators. Then after 2 more losses in a row, in which Proteus was pinned all 3 times(including the loss to the Gladiators), Actagon went and won the Interplanetary Title at January's Nova. As the show went off the air Proteus attacked Actagon, sending him out of the ring with the OVERHEAD TOSS.
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Nov 12, 2006 10:43:24 GMT -5
The Greeks were fairly boring for me. They won quite a bit thru 2091, then starrted to slide down. By 2097 they were competing for the IP Tag Titles instead of the main ones.
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Nov 15, 2006 13:19:25 GMT -5
Actagon/Actaeon.
Thantos/Thanatos.
Amazing how two mythological names can benefit from a single letter change to become more plausible as wrestlers. Just one man's opinion.
And glad we got Actagon earlier in his timeline than when his dogs ripped him apart.
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Nov 15, 2006 13:22:59 GMT -5
Actagon/Actaeon. Thantos/Thanatos. Amazing how two mythological names can benefit from a single letter change to become more plausible as wrestlers. Just one man's opinion. And glad we got Actagon earlier in his time line than when his dogs ripped him apart. One of the greatest matches in my feds history was at a Rigel Rumble where Actagon won the GWF Title from Thantos. He lost it back the next card, but man, I was like 14 when I had that match and I still remember it to this day.
|
|
|
Post by swarm on Nov 15, 2006 13:23:34 GMT -5
he won it on a deathjump, roll of 12.
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Nov 15, 2006 13:48:42 GMT -5
Precious memories, how they linger...
Okay, I better stop quoting Tennessee Ernie Ford now.
I can see Actagon beating Thantos. Those double finishers always killed for me. I never really used him in singles, though.
|
|
|
Post by larrywoodbury1 on Nov 19, 2006 11:29:07 GMT -5
Well if you ask me I think Actagon should have been pushed harder. I mean the guy is well built and has a nice set of moves. I think people didn't push him cause he's a tag team wrestler. Me I use the wrestlers everywhere to keep things spiced up. Proteus has held the i-p belt twice and after my relaunch( yes I started over again lol) Actagon held the i-p belt once and the heavyweight title once. A wrestler being good depends on how hard you push him. I try to push everyone to be great. Some wrestlers become great others just plain stay at the bottom. I pushed pulsar pretty hard and he manage to win the i-p title once so the weaker guys can win it just depends on how much you push them.
|
|