David Bazzy Basnett
Guest
|
Post by David Bazzy Basnett on Jan 27, 2005 0:51:31 GMT -5
 We have already got who we think will win the Royal Rumble debate . I will add a twist if you was Vince or WWE Board . And you had the power " Who would you make the Rumble winner ? " . Personally though Triple H v Batista is brewing up very slowly and is the one to see ? . I would go along with Batista . If there was no HHH v Batista . I would narrow it down to 3 Snitsky / Rey Mysterio & R Dupree . Probably go with Rey , which would brew to (v JBL) at Wrestlemania !
|
|
|
|
Post by thefamoustommyz on Jan 27, 2005 8:51:55 GMT -5
Batista, easy. With HHH trying to convince Batista to take on JBL so that "Evolution can have BOTH World titles"...before Batista picks HHH and we get Da Big Match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Graymar on Jan 27, 2005 9:51:41 GMT -5
Hey TommyZ, I like that idea!  Graymar |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Jan 27, 2005 17:15:27 GMT -5
God I hate to say it but Hogan.
Hogan beats JBL for the belt at WM.
Loses a unification match to HHH at SummerSlam and put the feds back together.
Take all the crap guys from Raw (Hurricane, Rosey, Simon Dean etc...) and all the crap guys from SmackDown (everyone but Show, Angle, RVD, Guerrero, Mysterio, JBL, Haas, Cena, Booker T...you know who they are...) and combine all those crappy guys with OVW and let Cornette run the Thursday show. OR...let Heyman run the Thursday ECW show.
This is two minutes of my life that was a total waste of time because it will never happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by thefamoustommyz on Jan 27, 2005 19:44:16 GMT -5
Hey TommyZ, I like that idea! Graymar There goes my good idea quota for the week....=) |
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire at Work on Jan 28, 2005 15:09:52 GMT -5
I agree that its got to be Batista, and I like the idea of HHH trying to convince him to smackdown.. it would really fit well with what's been going on.
As a second choice, I'd take John Cena, if only to have an excuse to get him to Raw.
-- Wildfire
|
|
|
|
Post by thefamoustommyz on Jan 28, 2005 19:46:07 GMT -5
Yeah, but Cena's the best thing Smackdown has going for it. He's one step away from being IT...
Whereas in Raw, he'd be standing behind Orton and Batista...unless he turned heel, then he'd wind up nehind HHH.
He's got an honest chance of being the top dog on Smackdown.
|
|
|
|
Post by tystates on Jan 29, 2005 9:43:57 GMT -5
First thing I would do is the winner of the Royal Rumble no longer gets a title shot at Wrestlemania. With that stipulation it's a waste for about 26 guys to even be in the match.
The Rumble was so much cooler when anyone could possibly win it. Also use a two minute interval between entrants so that the #1 & 2 guy would be int there an hour to the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by josharpie99 on Jan 29, 2005 15:18:18 GMT -5
Given the WWE's poor booking the past couple of years....I wouldn't be surprised to see Jonathan Coachman win the Rumble.
|
|
We have already got who we think will win the Royal Rumble debate . I will add a twist if you was Vince or WWE Board . And you had the power " Who would you make the Rumble winner ? " . 
