|
|
Post by toasterboy on Jun 7, 2007 12:28:41 GMT -5
When multiple falls are added to a match, only the deciding fall is shown when viewing the card. Is there a way to see ALL the falls for the match (ie a Survivor Series type Match).
BDS EDIT: Fixed in 1.08
|
|
|
|
Post by bambam on Jun 11, 2007 22:38:08 GMT -5
For every card, the first match is always a title match when I go to enter the results.. I don't put it as a title match. I have to delete it every time and do it again. Also the last match is set to be a title match, but it never is. I tried using the edit match thing but that doesn't work... so again I have to delete it and put it in again.
BDS EDIT: I didn't mark this yesterday, but Fixed in 1.08 ... correct me if I'm wrong, please
|
|
|
|
Post by toasterboy on Jun 12, 2007 11:24:02 GMT -5
I selected MrBeefy's dataset and then selected his AWA fed and after I clicked to set that as the active fed, I got this error:
Warning: mysql_result() [function.mysql-result]: Unable to jump to row 0 on MySQL result index 8 in /home/cotgonli/public_html/gamearea/stattracker/setfed.php on line 8
Then when I went to go view his rankings...
Warning: mysql_result() [function.mysql-result]: Unable to jump to row 0 on MySQL result index 8 in /home/cotgonli/public_html/gamearea/stattracker/rankings.php on line 6
BDS EDIT: Fixed in 1.25
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jun 12, 2007 19:53:07 GMT -5
I got the same error Grant did... in fact, it came up for a couple people.. I suspect it is those who haven't entered anything yet.
Is that true?
|
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jun 13, 2007 15:02:40 GMT -5
I played a match where Aegis beat Corporal Tek using the 2119 roster, but in the rankings Tek shows up as Tekaro.
BDS EDIT: Fixed in 1.25
|
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jun 13, 2007 15:05:31 GMT -5
When you play a 4-way match there is only one 'loser' and one winner (that part is fine obviously). Those wrestlers are the only ones who show as having wrestled in the rankings. Shouldn't 3 guys have losses? There's nothing to suggest they were even part of the match except when you look at the result.
BDS EDIT: Fixed in 1.23
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jun 13, 2007 15:09:25 GMT -5
I played a match where Aegis beat Corporal Tek using the 2119 roster, but in the rankings Tek shows up as Tekaro. I mentioned this to BDS towards the top (in regards to Rouser, but its the same problem) He said its low on the list, but will be fxed at some point. |
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jun 13, 2007 15:19:22 GMT -5
I played a match where Aegis beat Corporal Tek using the 2119 roster, but in the rankings Tek shows up as Tekaro. I mentioned this to BDS towards the top (in regards to Rouser, but its the same problem) He said its low on the list, but will be fxed at some point. Likely on the 25th.  |
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jun 13, 2007 15:56:21 GMT -5
When you play a 4-way match there is only one 'loser' and one winner (that part is fine obviously). Those wrestlers are the only ones who show as having wrestled in the rankings. Shouldn't 3 guys have losses? There's nothing to suggest they were even part of the match except when you look at the result. They should, and at one point very early on in development, they did. It's entirely possible that something we added broke this, so I'll take a look at it. It's most likely an easy fix. |
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jun 14, 2007 9:00:50 GMT -5
Very minor bug:
I gave match results like this: "pinfall due to sunset flip and cover"
I got a 'count-out' ranking
Thinking it was reading the 'co' in the word 'cover' I removed the 'and cover' part and it gave me a pinfall ranking. If this is actually how it works that might be a bit too sensitive if you can't use the letters c & o next to each other.
BDS EDIT: Fixed in 1.25
|
|
|
|
Post by toasterboy on Jun 14, 2007 10:12:54 GMT -5
Very minor bug: I gave match results like this: "pinfall due to sunset flip and cover" I got a 'count-out' ranking Thinking it was reading the 'co' in the word 'cover' I removed the 'and cover' part and it gave me a pinfall ranking. If this is actually how it works that might be a bit too sensitive if you can't use the letters c & o next to each other. How do you know which ranking a match result gives you? |
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jun 14, 2007 10:37:39 GMT -5
Very minor bug: I gave match results like this: "pinfall due to sunset flip and cover" I got a 'count-out' ranking Thinking it was reading the 'co' in the word 'cover' I removed the 'and cover' part and it gave me a pinfall ranking. If this is actually how it works that might be a bit too sensitive if you can't use the letters c & o next to each other. How do you know which ranking a match result gives you? By doing experimental matches involving all the rankers and then looking how many points each man is given on the rankings chart. Pretty simple. For example, Centra Prime media gives the winner +6 points and the loser -4 points for a basic pinfall win without any rating and normal match prestige. Whereas, they give the winner 4.75 points and -4 points for a count-out win with the same parameters. |
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jun 14, 2007 12:39:01 GMT -5
From the 'strange date resets' department:
the date on the 'add a card' menu seemed to default at 1/1/2070... I'd love to see it default to the date of the last card you played (like the rankings)
BDS EDIT: Implemented in 1.24
|
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jun 14, 2007 13:00:21 GMT -5
By doing experimental matches involving all the rankers and then looking how many points each man is given on the rankings chart. Pretty simple. For example, Centra Prime media gives the winner +6 points and the loser -4 points for a basic pinfall win without any rating and normal match prestige. Whereas, they give the winner 4.75 points and -4 points for a count-out win with the same parameters. BDS <3 jefft You're close ... I'm rounding some decimal places into the fires of Oblivion, so you're probably not ever going to see the math exactly right because of the imprecision of the results I spit out, but you've got a pretty good idea of what's going on there. As for why the decimal points went away, because I'm sure Wildfire will ask: I didn't like them. The rankings just seemed to be more "natural" with whole-number points to me, and they were still accurate enough to do the job. Having the precise decimal values takes away some of the fun of having Nemean or Lance do your rankings for you, IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jun 14, 2007 13:18:34 GMT -5
Heh, actually, I'm pretty content to know that Nemean like good matches, Nico only cares who wins, Rankor and Murdok seem to give themselves an extra 10 points 'cause that's the kinda guys they are, etc.
Uncharacterstic, I know, but the alternative would be spending the next 4 hours unravelling the formulas BDS is using by trial and error, which I'm resisting at the moment, but I admit the call is strong...
|
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jun 14, 2007 13:21:21 GMT -5
Heh, actually, I'm pretty content to know that Nemean like good matches, Nico only cares who wins, Rankor and Murdok seem to give themselves an extra 10 points 'cause that's the kinda guys they are, etc. Uncharacterstic, I know, but the alternative would be spending the next 4 hours unravelling the formulas BDS is using by trial and error, which I'm resisting at the moment, but I admit the call is strong... I've got a giant detailed excel chart. I have no willpower when it comes to statistical anality... PS: I think I just made up a new word. |
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jun 14, 2007 13:26:31 GMT -5
Uncharacterstic, I know, but the alternative would be spending the next 4 hours unravelling the formulas BDS is using by trial and error, which I'm resisting at the moment, but I admit the call is strong... That would only end in tragedy, Wildfire. From a purely mathematical standpoint, it's almost impossible; not because of the complexity of the formula itself or anything, but because of the imprecision I threw in there to suit my whims. Accursed decimal places! Plus, you'd see how ridiculous Nemean and friends are when it comes out to giving out their rankings, and you'd likely have a coronary. Nobody at this point is giving out points specifically to themselves or their teammates, but that's something I did toss around. What I ended up doing instead is tailoring certain rankers so that they'd naturally kind of float themselves up a little higher, and I'm glad to see it's working so far. |
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jun 14, 2007 13:40:29 GMT -5
Wow, that's impressive, then, if you managed to make Rankor boost himself up in a formulaic way, rather than just adding points to him... for instance.
*tips cap*
|
|
|
|
Post by Wildfire on Jun 14, 2007 13:43:37 GMT -5
Heh, actually, I'm pretty content to know that Nemean like good matches, Nico only cares who wins, Rankor and Murdok seem to give themselves an extra 10 points 'cause that's the kinda guys they are, etc. Uncharacterstic, I know, but the alternative would be spending the next 4 hours unravelling the formulas BDS is using by trial and error, which I'm resisting at the moment, but I admit the call is strong... I love spread sheets... y'all should see the mostrosity of a workbook I have to keep track of the DWA stuff... almost 300 wrestlers now. I've got a giant detailed excel chart. I have no willpower when it comes to statistical anality... PS: I think I just made up a new word. I love spread sheets... y'all should see the mostrosity of a workbook I have to keep track of the DWA stuff... almost 300 wrestlers now. |
|
|
|
Post by BDS on Jun 14, 2007 13:48:12 GMT -5
Wow, that's impressive, then, if you managed to make Rankor boost himself up in a formulaic way, rather than just adding points to him... for instance. *tips cap* Thank you! It won't work for everyone's feds, of course, but it should work for most. Murdok and Rankor tend to turn a blinder eye than most towards shenanigans. |
|
