|
|
Post by Knapik on Sept 6, 2007 22:22:15 GMT -5
Hey guys, I was wondering if I was the only one who got blurry PM cards? The pic on the cover of the booklet is blurry too.
|
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Sept 6, 2007 22:50:49 GMT -5
Mine were fine. [Insert joke about putting both contacts in one eye here.]
|
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Sept 6, 2007 22:53:05 GMT -5
Mine just looked like they were scanned in at a low resolution.
|
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Sept 6, 2007 23:16:00 GMT -5
Did you buy from Tom or the back of some guy's van? I've never had a bad set, nor heard of anyone else get one on this board before. If it's that bad you might want to contact Tom (or PM Swarm) and see if you can exchange it for a new one, a bad set might have slipped thru somehow.
|
|
|
|
Post by mft on Sept 6, 2007 23:17:03 GMT -5
Did you buy from Tom or the back of some guy's van? I've never had a bad set, nor heard of anyone else get one on this board before. If it's that bad you might want to contact Tom and see if you can exchange it for a new one, a bad set might have slipped thru somehow. A COTG blackmarket....lol |
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Sept 6, 2007 23:20:53 GMT -5
That's just weird that mine would have been the only one. I'm not going to send anything back, they look okay just not what I'm use to from the GWF. Like some of the Early Classics cards are kind of blurry/low res (or is that just me?). Maybe Werner's artwork just hates me haha.
|
|
|
|
Post by mft on Sept 6, 2007 23:22:39 GMT -5
That's just weird that mine would have been the only one. I'm not going to send anything back, they look okay just not what I'm use to from the GWF. Like some of the Early Classics cards are kind of blurry/low res (or is that just me?). Maybe Werner's artwork just hates me haha. My EC's is blurry as well. Where the heck is Mike M!  |
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Sept 6, 2007 23:31:54 GMT -5
I did notice that my EC wasn't quite on the same level as a normal card, the photos in the book especially. They were good, but not great like normal. But, my PM came in perfectly and on that new thicker stock Tom started using a couple of editions ago.  |
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Sept 7, 2007 0:01:26 GMT -5
Yes, I dig the new stock.
|
|
|
|
Post by GrumpyBigBee on Sept 7, 2007 7:42:38 GMT -5
That's just weird that mine would have been the only one. I'm not going to send anything back, they look okay just not what I'm use to from the GWF. Like some of the Early Classics cards are kind of blurry/low res (or is that just me?). Maybe Werner's artwork just hates me haha. my ec's were bad also. I want a refund! no, but yes they were bad... |
|
|
|
Post by Tournament Master on Sept 7, 2007 9:18:54 GMT -5
EC was done by a different printer than either Tom or I used, so that is the difference there.
Knapik, is there any specific PM cards that you notice a problem with?
|
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Sept 7, 2007 9:37:54 GMT -5
my pm set wasn't blurry.
|
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Sept 7, 2007 10:52:20 GMT -5
EC was done by a different printer than either Tom or I used, so that is the difference there. Knapik, is there any specific PM cards that you notice a problem with? Some are more noticeable than others, but all the black seems gray (like the GWF ones are way darker) and all the edges have a noticeable pixelation to them. I'm really not stressing it too much, I'm not looking for a new set or anything. |
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Sept 7, 2007 11:28:59 GMT -5
nope, mine all came out nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by GrumpyBigBee on Sept 18, 2007 10:21:21 GMT -5
EC was done by a different printer than either Tom or I used, so that is the difference there. Knapik, is there any specific PM cards that you notice a problem with? I have a few cards that are bad. Ill send you a list later TM. I think its like 5. But I assume they were done from Tom's printer or something. We'll talk more about it later but maybe I should send you mine and you can send me the better ones. =) |
|
