|
|
Post by dukedave on Jul 12, 2007 11:33:13 GMT -5
My point is that the Broncos and Bills guys in the sig are NFL licensed products. Characters that totally are taken directly from them would give the NFL cause to come after Filsinger Games. I wouldn't like the chances of Filsinger Games vs the NFL. Regardless, it wouldn't be tough to make slight chances and have Werner or someone base their drawing off of it but with minor changes. The cards DO have changes from the original logos. They're BASED on them, not copied directly. Even if the NFL teams in question did try to make a big deal about it, they wouldn't have much of a case I wouldn't think. They don't have the rights to all horse anthros or buffalo anthros just because they have that for a logo. I'm not sure what cards you're referring to but if it is the actual ones in the Wildcat sig, those are NFL property. They have them for every team. They were not made by Wildcat. If you mean CoTG cards, they could be based off the NFL stuff but some changes would need to be made to differentiate from the originals. My point is you cannot just take the horse in the Bronco stuff and use it on a card. |
|
|
|
Post by vansabu on Jul 12, 2007 11:38:17 GMT -5
Wheres the link to see the pictures ?
|
|
|
|
Post by kevink on Jul 12, 2007 11:39:26 GMT -5
Actually, since the cards that were made for him in the thread he mentioned are just as cool as the logos themselves he doesn't have to worry. After all, the cards aren't NFL licensed products. My point is that the Broncos and Bills guys in the sig are NFL licensed products. Characters that totally are taken directly from them would give the NFL cause to come after Filsinger Games. I wouldn't like the chances of Filsinger Games vs the NFL. Regardless, it wouldn't be tough to make slight chances and have Werner or someone base their drawing off of it but with minor changes. Hey Havok who did the color work on the card. I like it alot great job on that one! |
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jul 12, 2007 11:40:54 GMT -5
My point is that the Broncos and Bills guys in the sig are NFL licensed products. Characters that totally are taken directly from them would give the NFL cause to come after Filsinger Games. I wouldn't like the chances of Filsinger Games vs the NFL. Regardless, it wouldn't be tough to make slight chances and have Werner or someone base their drawing off of it but with minor changes. Hey Havok who did the color work on the card. I like it alot great job on that one! I have no clue. jefft emailed it to me and then thru the magic of photo bucket, oui la! Actually, I can't beleive how easy photo bucket was. |
|
|
|
Post by theamazingbadger on Jul 12, 2007 12:56:58 GMT -5
The cards DO have changes from the original logos. They're BASED on them, not copied directly. Even if the NFL teams in question did try to make a big deal about it, they wouldn't have much of a case I wouldn't think. They don't have the rights to all horse anthros or buffalo anthros just because they have that for a logo. I'm not sure what cards you're referring to but if it is the actual ones in the Wildcat sig, those are NFL property. They have them for every team. They were not made by Wildcat. If you mean CoTG cards, they could be based off the NFL stuff but some changes would need to be made to differentiate from the originals. My point is you cannot just take the horse in the Bronco stuff and use it on a card. The cards are in the thread that Wildcat linked to on the front page. There is clearly enough difference between those cards and the logos that they could become an official part of CotG without any legal problems. |
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Jul 12, 2007 12:58:57 GMT -5
I'm not sure what cards you're referring to but if it is the actual ones in the Wildcat sig, those are NFL property. They have them for every team. They were not made by Wildcat. If you mean CoTG cards, they could be based off the NFL stuff but some changes would need to be made to differentiate from the originals. My point is you cannot just take the horse in the Bronco stuff and use it on a card. The cards are in the thread that Wildcat linked to on the front page. There is clearly enough difference between those cards and the logos that they could become an official part of CotG without any legal problems. Ah, that's where my confusion was. Saw the tag team comment he made but not the actual link. My error on that end. |
|
