|
|
Post by cakejedi on May 23, 2006 17:39:01 GMT -5
This is a hard question. There are strong points for both choices. But my personality would rather be a big fish in a small pond. I have a need to feel like I am making a difference in the company I am working for in terms of it's success. I want to be able to have valuable input in the direction that the company goes. It would be hard to have that kind of input as a small fish in a big pond. So I would choose to swim in the smaller pond and feel like I was making a significant contribution to the life of that pond.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Ingersoll on May 23, 2006 18:34:43 GMT -5
This is a hard question. There are strong points for both choices. But my personality would rather be a big fish in a small pond. I have a need to feel like I am making a difference in the company I am working for in terms of it's success. I want to be able to have valuable input in the direction that the company goes. It would be hard to have that kind of input as a small fish in a big pond. So I would choose to swim in the smaller pond and feel like I was making a significant contribution to the life of that pond. That's something I never considered, and a very good point. Not changing my opinion, but that's because I like anonymity.  |
|
|
|
Post by Vanilla Gorilla on May 24, 2006 11:27:05 GMT -5
I would rather be the Brooklyn Brawler instead of Samoa Joe, and not to point out that Brawler is the more popular of the two but who's pointing fingers
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on May 24, 2006 11:45:54 GMT -5
Small fish in a big pond I think is slightly more desirable as you may eventually have the chance to move up and be the big fish in the big pond.
|
|
|
|
Post by MikeMcKinney on May 29, 2006 23:53:22 GMT -5
I'd rather be the big fish in a small pond and rule my area. Be a main eventer not an opening act.....
|
|
