|
|
Post by incognito on Oct 16, 2006 14:54:18 GMT -5
can somebody go unbeaten, untied over 19 games?
Yes, but not this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by vansabu on Oct 16, 2006 15:58:29 GMT -5
No team this year is unbeatable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thad Killian on Oct 16, 2006 16:04:27 GMT -5
sweet and to the point...no way...
|
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Oct 16, 2006 17:55:59 GMT -5
Sorry, not this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Oct 16, 2006 18:40:29 GMT -5
The polling seems pretty close so far.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mad Dog on Oct 16, 2006 21:48:26 GMT -5
Nope, the only thing harder than going undefeated in the NFL is going winless.
|
|
|
|
Post by gwffantrav on Oct 16, 2006 22:01:31 GMT -5
the raiders via prowrestlings definition of undefeated.Don't you mean the WWE's definition?!? ;D Raiders > Umaga! 
|
|
|
|
Post by incognito on Oct 16, 2006 23:08:21 GMT -5
the raiders via prowrestlings definition of undefeated.Don't you mean the WWE's definition?!? ;D Raiders > Umaga! I think all feds have used less than honest tactics in their streaks. WCW had Goldberg, TNA has Joe, WWE had Umaga (Jamal) (Did they acknowledge the loss at all?, I was flipping back and forth from the game.) none of which had streaks that were completely honest. |
|
