|
|
Post by Bazzy on Jul 22, 2007 21:42:21 GMT -5
is the GWF got to violent ? Who is right Endgame or Commssioner Massif ?
|
|
|
|
Post by MikeMcKinney on Jul 22, 2007 22:58:11 GMT -5
Hell no, it's wrestling .....it should be more violent.
|
|
|
|
Post by swo on Jul 22, 2007 23:03:53 GMT -5
violence in the ring is cool....the gun stuff....I like it but it may be considered over the top.
|
|
|
|
Post by JMello on Jul 22, 2007 23:33:54 GMT -5
I think the game has grown up with its players and is at the level it needs to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Jul 23, 2007 0:21:42 GMT -5
GWF needs more violence! Violence! Violence! Violence! It is what the fans want!
|
|
|
|
Post by jefft on Jul 23, 2007 6:46:55 GMT -5
I think its fine, but the gun thing is pretty serious and the punishment should have been way more severe for something like that.
I REALLY like Endgame trying to bring back the Galactic Code though. Gives him some personality.
|
|
|
|
Post by cyclehog2121 on Jul 23, 2007 6:52:50 GMT -5
Thats what makes the GWF Universe go round (ACE is centered on war and death). Wrestling without violence doesn't work. It also gives the Faces something to work against to make them popular. Endgame is right and its a good thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnnyreb on Jul 23, 2007 16:46:56 GMT -5
it should be wrestling not shootout at the o.k corall
|
|
|
|
Post by Aquinas on Jul 23, 2007 16:53:20 GMT -5
I would probably support Endgame if I was a fan of those times, so I voted pro-Endgame. As a promoter playing the game, guys like The Betrayer, Nosfera, Drury and American Guy are way too much fun to see removed  |
|
