The Wise King Solomon
Guest
|
Post by The Wise King Solomon on Apr 12, 2004 18:47:31 GMT -5
Lets say Tom decided to put together a special edition GWF All Star set. It would have 12 characters, featured in their prime, released with new color photos. There would be in-depth biographies for each character (in place of the usual guidebooks) that covers info never before released that gives a COMPLETE description of each character before, during & after their GWF career. Who would you want to be a part of it? Although it's difficult to limit it to 12, here are my pics: 1. Chaos: the man, but a man of mystery. We don't even know his real name. I'd love to see him fletched out. 2. Omega: The founding father of the GWF. I'd love to learn more about his background. 3. Paragon: so much unfulfilled potential. I think he'd make for a great story. 4. Thunder: from slave to superstar to legend. 5. Vengeance: his prison background would be a cool read. 6. Pegasus: from gambler to legendary hero. 7. Star Warrior: my favorite from the Omega clan. 8. Wolf: enough said. 9. Thantos: what's the story behind the young Cosmos? 10. Matador: a perfect all star. Why did he go to Dimension X in the first place? 11. Desolation Factor: My favorite tag force, I'd love to see more depth applied to them. 12. Eclipse: All I know is that Rising Sun had a rough upbringing. I'd love to learn more. If you could chose any 12 stars in the ENTIRE history of the GWF, who would you chose to be part of an all star set?
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Apr 12, 2004 19:19:10 GMT -5
Spike, Brute, Massacre, Mayhem, Vengeance, Thunder, Overkill, Malice, Disaster, Santon the Loner, Wolf and Bounty Hunter
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Apr 12, 2004 19:56:31 GMT -5
1. Chaos
2. Omega
3. Star Warrior
4. Thantos
5. Morpheus
6. Thunder
7. Wolf
8. Spike
9. Massacre
10. Brute
11. Dreggs
12. Sleeze
A little heavy on the Glads, but I think that overall it's a good mix of singles, tag and hard core.
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Apr 13, 2004 2:28:45 GMT -5
COTG All-Stars
1) Thantos 2) Star Warrior 3) Spike 4) Wolf 5) Massacre 6) Chaos 7) Thunder 8) Matador of M83 9) Pegasus 10) Disaster 11) Bloodline 12) Euritar
|
|
|
Post by gamtime247 on Apr 13, 2004 13:28:06 GMT -5
1-Thantos 2-Chaos 3-Wolf 4-Spike 5-Omega 6-Brute 7-Massacre 8-Star Warrior 9-Bishop Hell 10-Matador 11-Mandrill 12-Incredible Badger (I always think of the guy as tito santana, so underappreciated)
|
|
|
Post by JimSteel on Apr 14, 2004 11:54:59 GMT -5
1-Wolf 2-Star Warrior 3-Chaos 4-Thantos 5-Spike 6-Brute 7-Massacre 8-Matador of M83 9-Disaster 10-Pegasus 11-Thunder 12-Godsend
|
|
The Wise King Solomon
Guest
|
Post by The Wise King Solomon on Apr 14, 2004 13:55:55 GMT -5
Great work everyone. This has been an interesting thought experiment. I hope the other promoters have enjoyed reading the various lists as much as I have, as my enjoyment has been both personal & deep. In our collective wisdom, there seems to be a consensus built as to whom qualifies as an all star. With literally hundreds of characters having come & gone in COTG, it speaks well of the top vote getters legacies. Here are All Star candidates who's names have appeared multiple times on various promoters ballots: Wolf (6 times) Thantos (5 times) Star Warrior (5 times) Chaos (5 times) Spike (5 times) Massacre (5 times) Thunder (5 times) Brute (4 times) Matador (4 times) Pegasus (3 times) Omega (3 times) Disaster (3 times) Vengeance (2 times) Dark Horse All Stars (one vote each) Mandrill Bishop Hell Bounty Hunter Incredible Badger Paragon Morpheus Eclipse Dreggs Sleeze Godsend Rack Ruin Euritar Bloodline Malice Mayhem Santon Overkill Very interesting indeed.
|
|
|
Post by jsanudo on Apr 14, 2004 16:20:21 GMT -5
My 12 are:
1. Chaos 2. Matador 3. Omega 4. Spike 5. Morpheus 6. Thantos 7. Paragon 8. Pegasus 9. Dreggs 10. Sleeze 11. Rack 12. Ruin
|
|
|
Post by Darth Turkish on Apr 14, 2004 16:43:52 GMT -5
Oh my! So many to choose from!
My 12 are:
Thantos Omega Matador Wolf Spike Chaos Bishop Hell Code Enforcer (Manslaughter) Mace Dreggs Ursa Major Rising Sun
|
|
|
Post by Thad Killian on Apr 14, 2004 17:44:57 GMT -5
Okay, here I go....
1. Star Warrior 2. Thantos 3. Omega 4. Morpheus 5. Bishop Hell 6. Spike (whooo...the poster boy) 7. Brute 8. Massacre 9. Comrade Terror/Dreadnaught 10. Chaos 11. Vigilante 12. Janus the Overman (In my opinion, the most underrated)
|
|
|
Post by Joe on Apr 14, 2004 18:04:11 GMT -5
1) Wolf 2) Star Warrior 3) Thantos 4) Chaos 5) Spike 6) Massacre 7) Brute 8) Alpha Force 9) Pegasus 10) The Matador of M83 11) Prodigy 12) Thunder
|
|
|
Post by COTG Historian on Apr 14, 2004 18:36:54 GMT -5
Here's an interesting statistic. Below are the names of actual members of the GWF Hall of Fame who at this moment have not secured even one vote on any promoters All Star ballot:
Battering Ram Commander Sam Dragonmaster Parsec Tantalis Exo-King Actagon Proteus Krakan Marcel De Sade Massif Solaris Lord Nexus Billy Jo Boxer Soldier of Fortune Pulsar
When push comes to shove & the pressure is on, what does this say about the veracity of their legacies?
|
|
|
Post by GalactiKing on Apr 14, 2004 19:10:38 GMT -5
Dragon Master would be on mine. Mine was a bit of a joke as I picked all Gladiators (or teammates of Gladiators)
|
|
|
Post by Randall on Apr 14, 2004 22:45:34 GMT -5
Here's an interesting statistic. Below are the names of actual members of the GWF Hall of Fame who at this moment have not secured even one vote on any promoters All Star ballot: Battering Ram Commander Sam Dragonmaster Parsec Tantalis Exo-King Actagon Proteus Krakan Marcel De Sade Massif Solaris Lord Nexus Billy Jo Boxer Soldier of Fortune Pulsar When push comes to shove & the pressure is on, what does this say about the veracity of their legacies? By "Promotor's All-Star Ballot" you mean this thread? If so, I'd say that it says this is a small percentage of the overall number of promoters in the Galaxy, and therefore not representative of any such "All-Star" compilation. I could be wrong, though.
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Apr 15, 2004 6:20:25 GMT -5
Here's an interesting statistic. Below are the names of actual members of the GWF Hall of Fame who at this moment have not secured even one vote on any promoters All Star ballot: [snip] When push comes to shove & the pressure is on, what does this say about the veracity of their legacies? What it says is that (a) we've got a small sample size of the voters participating "off-the-cuff" and (b) there's a lot more than 12 hall-of-famers. It also seems like people were more predisposed to put in 12 singles wrestlers (with the exception of Brute and Massacre) than to include tag team guys. If people were required to put in more tag-team wrestlers in or more "slots" were available, my guess is that more tag team wrestlers would have made it. Also, some legit hall-of-famers in other sports would have a hard time making an "all-time" team as well. Look at Harmon Killebrew. He's a legit HOFer in baseball who would never make the top three at his position (I'll just throw out Ted Williams, Rickey Henderson and Barry Bonds as examples of who would be ahead of him), much less in the starting 9 or 25-man roster. That doesn't speak ill of him- just how great the others are. Battering Ram- see Harmon Killebrew Commander Sam- see Harmon Killebrew Dragonmaster- see Harmon Killebrew Parsec- hard to judge this guy without playing all the Classics years Tantalis- See Parsec Exo-King- see Harmon Killebrew Actagon- see tag wrestlers Proteus- see tag wrestlers Krakan- see Harmon Killebrew Marcel De Sade- see Harmon Killebrew Massif- see Harmon Killebrew Solaris- he's a manager, so that figures too Lord Nexus- see Harmon Killebrew/tag wrestlers Billy Jo Boxer- see tag wrestlers Soldier of Fortune- see tag wrestlers Pulsar- see Harmon Killebrew
|
|
|
Post by TDalton on Apr 15, 2004 8:20:36 GMT -5
Okay - this is slightly off topic - but what's the problem with Harmon Killebrew? First of all, he played third base and first base, not outfield. The reason he's in the baseball HOF is because he was one of the greatest players of his time. He was no Brooks Robinson at third, but he led the league in home runs 6 times and drove in 100 runs 9 times. He had 573 career home runs (when that meant something) and was one of the most feared hitters in baseball. He wouldn't rank in the top 3 at first or third, but if that was the case, only 27 people would be enshrined at Cooperstown. Next time, pick on Rabbit Maranville.
There, I feel much better now. Carry on...
|
|
The Wise King Solomon
Guest
|
Post by The Wise King Solomon on Apr 15, 2004 8:35:31 GMT -5
Great job everyone. Here is an update in the All Star ballot standings:
Thantos 9 Chaos 9 Spike 9 Wolf 8 Matador 7 Star Warrior 7 Massacre 7 Thunder 6 Brute 6 Omega 6 Pegasus 5 Morpheus 3 Bishop Hell 3 Dreggs 3 Disaster 3 Paragon 2 Eclipse 2 Vengeance 2 Rack 2 Ruin 2
Dark Horse Nominees (one vote each)
Prodigy Janus Ursa Major Alpha Force Comrade Terror Mace Manslaughter Mandrill Bounty Hunter Incredible Badger Sleeze Godsend Euritar Bloodline Malice Mayhem Santon Overkill
Newcomers feel free to cast your ballots!
|
|
|
Post by Mike M on Apr 15, 2004 9:38:39 GMT -5
Okay - this is slightly off topic - but what's the problem with Harmon Killebrew? First of all, he played third base and first base, not outfield. The reason he's in the baseball HOF is because he was one of the greatest players of his time. He was no Brooks Robinson at third, but he led the league in home runs 6 times and drove in 100 runs 9 times. He had 573 career home runs (when that meant something) and was one of the most feared hitters in baseball. He wouldn't rank in the top 3 at first or third, but if that was the case, only 27 people would be enshrined at Cooperstown. Next time, pick on Rabbit Maranville. There, I feel much better now. Carry on... Continuing off-topic for a moment..... You're right, Tim. Killebrew did play more games at third and first, but he also spent the better part of three seasons of the middle of his career in left (470 total games in the outfield). Substitute Brock, Yaz or Kiner for Killebrew in my example if you prefer. If you look at him at first, he falls behind Gehrig and Foxx, plus maybe a couple other guys (depending on your opinion). At third, Schmidt, Matthews, and Brett surpass him (maybe Robinson too if you value defense highly). My point was that even a GREAT, legimate HOFer like Killebrew would have a hard time making a top 9 or top 25 list in baseball. I wanted to illustrate how being left off a list of 12 meant nothing, but being included in said list was truly special. I think that we both feel the same way about "Killer". Certainly no offense was intended to one of the greatest power hitters that the game has ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by Knapik on Apr 15, 2004 10:51:44 GMT -5
Mike has caught a super dose of the correct!
|
|
Thunder Fire Driver
Guest
|
Post by Thunder Fire Driver on Apr 15, 2004 13:09:52 GMT -5
First my ballot: 1 Thantos 2 Chaos 3 Star Warrior 4 Wolf 5 Matador 6 Thunder 7 Pegasus 8 Spike 9 Omega 10 Alpha Force 11 Rack 12 Ruin "My point was that even a GREAT, legitimate HOFer like Killebrew would have a hard time making a top 9 or top 25 list in baseball. I wanted to illustrate how being left off a list of 12 meant nothing, but being included in said list was truly special." I have to disagree. By limiting the choices to only 12, the pattern that is emerging in this thread reflects each voters highest standards. Certain characters (Thantos, Chaos, Spike) appear to be meeting this exalted standard in the minds of most, others meet the standard in the minds of some, and others just don't seem to meet it at all. If guys from all three groups are included in the SAME Hall of Fame, it points out a problem. The whole point of any Hall of Fame is to honor those with distinguished accomplishments. The initial induction process is what sets the standard. It's either high with a raised bar, or low with shallow credibility.. This is where I see a problem with the GWF Hall of Fame, particularly with the quality of some of the earliest inductees, which has caused an amalgamated approach to standards. Looking back at how many characters/game years were available back when the original GWF Hall of Fame was started, the historical size of the roster was obviously much smaller than it is today. Putting aside whether or not there was a right period of time to wait before creating a HOF, the fact that there were relatively few game editions to gage the depth of the nominees in effect yielded a much lower standard of inclusion than one would face had voting began today (where there are over 30 game editions & hundreds of characters to chose from). Were the very first votes for induction cast today, I suspect that guys like Pit Viper, Solaris, Billy Jo Boxer would NOT get in...at least not on the first ballot. I don't believe this could be attributed to promoters having short memories, because in this thread guys from the Classic sets like Omega & Morpheus seem to be racking up the votes. I also wouldn't attribute it to bias against tag teams, as Brute, Massacre, Rack, Ruin & Dreggs are all gaining individual votes, despite being primarily known as tag wrestlers. I think the obstacle a guy like Proteus would likely face would be that given a larger historical perspective, it's very difficult to justify his importance on an exalted level. His inclusion just isn't merited. If you look at the Wrestling Observer HOF, a legit legend like Bob Backlund (who actually headlined the most profitable territory in the country for 6 years) struggles & fails get in, but in the GWF HOF a mid card guy like Billy Jo Boxer is able to cruise right in? It just doesn't make sense. You used Harmon Killebrew as an example, but the analogy doesn't fit with many of the early inductees. Someone like Marcel de Sade, compared to his peers like Star Warrior, Alpha Force or Wolf, was nowhere near as dominate a superstar in the GWF as either a Killebrew or Yaz, or Brock, or Kiner were. Nor was Sade on the level of a Lou Thesz, or Farmer Burns or Ric Flair. Chaos, Thantos & Spike meet that standard, but a Marcel de Sade does not. He was in actuality a low to mid card competitor in his prime, and more importantly, inconsequential in the overall scheme of things. So why is he standing in the same HOF as Omega? It's off putting to see characters like Massif & Exo-King given the same HOF status as Thantos, when while they competed in the same time frame, they were clearly a notch below. A Harmon Killebrew....Battering Ram NEVER was. Thankfully, aside from the head scratching early inductees, the more recent inductees have been more Killerbrewesque, meaning the top stars of their time. I'd attribute that to the fact that a larger historical roster has increased both the standards & depth of perspective voters use in making their decisions.
|
|