|
|
Post by rawhide on Dec 8, 2007 15:03:15 GMT -5
Yeah, you are NO expert. Your ignorant anti-WWE comments on the John Cena video thread proved that.  And you are wrong here too. If the Seahawks defeat the Cardinals this Sunday then they clinch the NFC West which means they can automatically host a Wild Card round game at Qwest Field were the Seahawks are 5-1 this year. Also, many ACTUAL experts consider Qwest Field among the loudest stadiums in the NFL which is statistically backed up by the number of false starts called on the opponents' offense. Look at the previous posts in this thread where Pure Hatred, an ACTUAL expert who writes columns on the NFL, even said trhe Seahawks have "a dog of a home field advantage." Sudden death in the NFL playoffs- anything can happen you only have to win 1 game at a time and not a series. The Seahawks may or may not get past the first round of the playoffs, but playing at Qwest Field means they definitely have more than "little chance." Mr. Smart aleck, I don't care if someone who calls himself "Pure Hatred" writes for anything, the Seahags are not that good. Dude, do you watch the NFL? The AFC is that much better. Dallas and Green Bay are the only two NFC teams that have consistently shown they have the stuff to compete with the AFC, and both those teams will get smacked around in the Super Bowl. Kinda like last year. Kind of like every year since the late 90s. I forgot, debating sports at filsingergames.com is useless. Idiot Seahags homer. and you've known this since when ? and still keep on doing it. as for mr.v being a idiot i dont think so. hes just expressing his opinion just like you. |
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Dec 9, 2007 4:23:14 GMT -5
Here is the preview for today's game that I just read online at the Seattle Times:
Preview | Seahawks vs. Cardinals, 1:05 p.m
Seattle vs. Arizona at Qwest Field
Kickoff: 1:05 p.m
The line: Seattle by 7.
Key questions
1. What can RB Shaun Alexander take from his return to the lineup last week after missing three games? Alexander, coach Mike Holmgren said, was happy to be back last week and missed playing. He needs that kind of hunger today against a pretty good run defense. If nothing else, Alexander ran tough for the most part and showed he still has to be accounted for in games. He found the end zone and should be more fresh because Maurice Morris will get his share of playing time as well.
2. What is the difference between Matt Leinart, who quarterbacked Arizona in its win over Seattle in September, and current QB Kurt Warner? Warner is the savvy veteran who slings the ball around and has done well in putting his team in position to win. But he doesn't take hits well. Leinart is a young talent with a bright future but struggled and lost playing time before getting injured.
3. Are the Cardinals really a threat to win the NFC West? Doubtful. A Seattle victory means it holds the NFC West tiebreaker with a better division record. Arizona showed it can play with any team and have a favorable schedule, but could be missing injured stars WRs Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald and S Adrian Wilson.
4. Which kicker is in a worse slump, Arizona's Neil Rackers or Seattle's Josh Brown? It has to be Brown, with five misses in the past four games. Rackers, a 2005 Pro Bowler, has missed two in the past three games, including a winning kick.
5. Where do the Seahawks need to show the most improvement from last week to today? Easy — special teams. Brown has to right himself, Boone Stutz needs to keep working on his snaps, and the coverage unit can't give up long returns. Ryan Plackemeier averaged 20.4 yards on seven punts.
Notable
Seahawks: The Seahawks lead the league with an opposing quarterback rating of 68.5. ... Through 12 games, Seattle has only allowed two 100-yard rushers. One was Arizona's Edgerrin James in Week 2. ... WR Bobby Engram's 72 catches are tied for ninth-most in the NFL. ... Lofa Tatupu leads the team with 90 tackles (70 solo). He also had his first interception of the season at Arizona in Week 2. Tatupu tied a team record for interceptions in a game with three last week. ... The Seahawks' 36 sacks as a team is second-most in the NFL.
Cardinals: Warner has two 300-yard games in four career starts against Seattle, but the Seahawks have a good history of harassing and hurting him. ... James aims for his third game in a row against the Seahawks with 100-plus yards and at least one TD. ... LB Karlos Dansby has three interceptions in the past four games. ... The Cardinals are 4-7 against Seattle since the Seahawks joined the NFC West in 2002.
Injury report
Seahawks: Out: WR D.J. Hackett (ankle) and CB Josh Wilson (quadriceps). Probable: DT Rocky Bernard (groin), S Mike Green (knee), LB Will Herring (hamstring) and C Chris Spencer (oblique).
Cardinals: Out: DT Ross Kolodziej (quadriceps) and S Aaron Francisco (calf). Questionable: WR Anquan Boldin (toe) and WR Larry Fitzgerald (groin). Probable: WR Jerheme Urban (heel) and QB Kurt Warner (elbow).
Last game Seahawks: Tatupu intercepted three A.J. Feeley passes, the third one with 14 seconds left in the game, to lead the Seahawks past the Philadelphia Eagles 28-24 last Sunday in Philadelphia. The Eagles had a chance to win after a long punt return, but Tatupu stepped in front of a pass over the middle to seal Seattle's fourth consecutive win. Alexander returned to the starting lineup and rushed for 65 yards and his first TD since Week 2, and Morris added a 45-yard scoring run. Bobby Engram and Nate Burleson each had a TD reception, and the Seattle defense came up with another huge goal-line stand, keeping the Eagles out of the end zone on a fourth-down play at the end of the first half.
Cardinals: Arizona got a big 27-21 win over the playoff-contending Cleveland Browns, thanks to four Browns turnovers that the Cardinals turned into 21 points. Roderick Hood had two interceptions (one he returned for a touchdown), and the Cardinals withstood 379 yards of total offense from the Browns. Warner threw a pair of TD passes.
Who has the advantage?
QB RB WR OL DL LB DB ST
Seattle × × × × × ×
Arizona × ×
Edit: The 2 Xs for the Cardinals didn't show up right but they were supposed to be for the RB and OL posistions.
|
|
hogan
Midcarder
Posts: 99
|
Post by hogan on Dec 9, 2007 16:44:00 GMT -5
I will not address Havoc's nonsense... And then you proceed to address my supposed "nonsense." Which is it, Einstein. Make up your mind. I'm not looking for a fight. Fighting with you is like picking on the retarded kid in class. While fun for maybe five seconds, it's just not fair. Oh, no. He just called me a loser .....and a punk...... This is the type of "class" one deals with on this Internet thread.  Out of respect for Mr. Vegas, another member of the board who exhibits this "class" that you seek while failing to hold yourself, I will no longer respond in this thread unless he feels that it is neccessary for me to point out your douchebaggery. Idiot. Mr. Vegas, I don't appreciate being criticized for posting my thoughts on something even if it was "out on a whim." Havoc has been doing this for ages. There was someone named Swarm on here who had developed a reputation for this. I'm sorry if my "aggressive" posting offends, but I won't succumb to Internet message board double standards. This is the Sunday morning Sports Reporters here. It's an Internet message board. Thank you, Hogan |
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Dec 9, 2007 16:49:38 GMT -5
dont you mean this isn't hogan ?
|
|
hogan
Midcarder
Posts: 99
|
Post by hogan on Dec 9, 2007 16:51:29 GMT -5
dont you mean this isn't hogan ? What? |
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Dec 9, 2007 16:55:10 GMT -5
dont you mean this isnt sunday morning sports reporters ?
|
|
hogan
Midcarder
Posts: 99
|
Post by hogan on Dec 9, 2007 17:02:09 GMT -5
dont you mean this isnt sunday morning sports reporters ? I have no clue what you are trying to talk about. I said this isn't Sunday morning Sports Reporters simply because people tend to think serious discussions online must occur all the time when, what I've learned on here, it can often become a game of trying to tear down the other posters by the select few. I made one comment about my opinions of the WWE and their constant handling of their own "woe-is-us" relationship with the press, and I get blasted. I actually thought CNN did a good job with their report and the brainiacs on this Web site thought it was a terrible report because of one incident. Is this a media critique blog?? Whatever. So, my gloves are off. People like Havoc like to constantly post snide remarks to antagonize and everyone knows this. What's the Seahawks score? |
|
|
|
Post by PureHatred on Dec 9, 2007 17:10:51 GMT -5
He is pointing out that, in the initial post you typed "this IS Sunday Morning Sports Reporters" when you apparently meant to type "ISN'T."
If you want to open up the Cena/CNN can of worms again....good luck with that.
Because that was a terrible post, CNN looked foolish (and went on to correct their mistakes), and they even managed to make the WWE seem sympathetic when the E normally comes off as a pack of liars in any issue related to the Wellnss Program.
|
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Dec 9, 2007 17:10:57 GMT -5
dont you mean this isn't hogan ? What? Geez, being outsmarted by Neily( ;D), not a good sign Captain Douchebag (I mean josharpie, welcome back, by the way). Your post says "This is the Sunday morning Sports Reporters here. It's an Internet message board." Neily, and the rest of the board (Even Bazzy  ) are unsure what you meant he deduced that you meant "This isn't the Sunday Morning Sports Reporters." BTW - You aren't being criticized for giving your opinions, you're being criticized for acting like a complete tool when giving your opinion as well as not having a clue what you are talking about when you give some of your opinions. |
|
hogan
Midcarder
Posts: 99
|
Post by hogan on Dec 9, 2007 20:05:31 GMT -5
Geez, being outsmarted by Neily( ;D), not a good sign Captain Douchebag (I mean josharpie, welcome back, by the way). Your post says "This is the Sunday morning Sports Reporters here. It's an Internet message board." Neily, and the rest of the board (Even Bazzy ) are unsure what you meant he deduced that you meant "This isn't the Sunday Morning Sports Reporters." BTW - You aren't being criticized for giving your opinions, you're being criticized for acting like a complete tool when giving your opinion as well as not having a clue what you are talking about when you give some of your opinions. I didn't even bother to read this. You are an idiot. An a$$. Jerk. Whatever. |
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Dec 9, 2007 20:06:43 GMT -5
Geez, being outsmarted by Neily( ;D), not a good sign Captain Douchebag (I mean josharpie, welcome back, by the way). Your post says "This is the Sunday morning Sports Reporters here. It's an Internet message board." Neily, and the rest of the board (Even Bazzy ) are unsure what you meant he deduced that you meant "This isn't the Sunday Morning Sports Reporters." BTW - You aren't being criticized for giving your opinions, you're being criticized for acting like a complete tool when giving your opinion as well as not having a clue what you are talking about when you give some of your opinions. I didn't even bother to read this. You are an idiot. An a$$. Jerk. Whatever. Hey, josharpie, the Cardinals still suck. |
|
|
|
Post by Trent Lawless on Dec 9, 2007 20:07:30 GMT -5
Before this thread gets locked due to immature behavior (come on, guys, take it outside):
THE SEAHAWKS ARE THE CHAMPS OF THE NFC WEST, BABY!
|
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Dec 9, 2007 20:10:42 GMT -5
Before this thread gets locked due to immature behavior (come on, guys, take it outside): THE SEAHAWKS ARE THE CHAMPS OF THE NFC WEST, BABY!I got permission from thread starter to patrol for douchebaggery. Congrats to the Seahawks. |
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Dec 9, 2007 20:50:24 GMT -5
Seahawks 42, Cardinals 21
Seahawks win their :
5th straight game
4th straight NFC West Championship
and make the playoffs for the 5th year in a row!
And at the very least, they are guaranteed to host at least one playoff game.
I am going to Seattle in a couple of weeks to visit my parents for Christmas and there is a slight chance that someone I know might give me his tickets to the Seahawks game against the Ravens. If I don't get his tivckets then this will be the first year since 2003 that I won't have gone to a Seahawks game because they're sold out now.
|
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Dec 10, 2007 1:30:56 GMT -5
I just got done looking at the standings on ESPN. And it looks like the Seahawks can clinch at least the NFC's third seed if they defeat Carolina next weekend because Tampa Bay is currently leading the NFC South and they're one game behind the Seahawks with 3 to go and the Seahawks own the tiebreaker between them and Tampa Bay since they defeated the Buccaneers in the opening week of the season.
It was just an awesome weekend in sports for me. On Saturday night I got to sit courtside and watch my school UNLV defeat Fresno State and then met and got Jerry Tarkanian's autograph at the victory party after the game. And today my favorite football team the Seahawks once again win the NFC West Championship.
Go Seahawks!
|
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Dec 10, 2007 22:30:31 GMT -5
anybody know who was the first buccaneer in the hof ?
|
|
|
|
Post by stephenvegas on Dec 10, 2007 22:55:28 GMT -5
anybody know who was the first buccaneer in the hof ? I think it is Lee Roy Selmon who was Tampa Bay's first-ever draft pick. Tampa Bay actually started its franchise history the same year as the Seattle Seahawks. |
|
|
|
Post by rawhide on Dec 10, 2007 22:57:04 GMT -5
i know that mr. v  . The last part i mean. |
|
hogan
Midcarder
Posts: 99
|
Post by hogan on Dec 11, 2007 9:34:44 GMT -5
Before this thread gets locked due to immature behavior (come on, guys, take it outside): THE SEAHAWKS ARE THE CHAMPS OF THE NFC WEST, BABY!I got permission from thread starter to patrol for douchebaggery. Congrats to the Seahawks. Here's a novel concept for you, Havoc, why don't you actually start a thread rather than troll through one looking for openings to make "cute" remarks. Yes, congrats to the Seahawks as well. They looked good this past weekend. They always do at home. |
|
|
|
Post by dukedave on Dec 11, 2007 9:37:43 GMT -5
Here's a novel concept for you, Havoc, why don't you actually start a thread rather than troll through one looking for openings to make "cute" remarks. Says the guy who followed me to 3-4 seperate threads just to criticize what I post. josharpie, I know you missed me but your obsession with me is disturbing, please seek some help. |
|
And you are wrong here too. 
) are unsure what you meant he deduced that you meant "This isn't the Sunday Morning Sports Reporters."
. The last part i mean.